Networked SIRS model with Kalman filter state estimation for epidemic monitoring in Europe
Aalto, A.; Proverbio, D.; Giordano, G.; Skupin, A.; Goncalves, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundMetapopulation models, which consider epidemic spread across interconnected regions, can provide more accurate epidemic predictions with respect to country-specific models. Still, their added complexity and data requirements raise questions about their tangible benefits over simpler, localized models. AimOur goal is to develop and validate networked metapopulation SIRS models, integrated with an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), for predicting influenza-like illness (ILI) across Europe, which enables accurate forecasts, missing data imputation, and actionable insights. MethodsWe constructed two different metapopulation SIRS models: a detailed network-based model, including inter-country travel dynamics, and a simpler mean-field model, aggregating average regional data. Both were calibrated based on decade-long data of European mobility and ILI incidence, using EKF to estimate disease dynamics and forecast epidemic progression. The forecasting performance was benchmarked against isolated country-specific models. ResultsNetwork models outperformed isolated models in forecasting ILI progression, particularly during critical periods such as wave onsets and peaks, and maintained reliability during COVID-19-affected seasons. The full network model provided up to 25% improvement in peak predictions and demonstrated robustness in imputing missing data, even when up to 40% of the input data was unavailable. The models are fully interpretable and align with epidemiological dynamics across borders. ConclusionOur findings unveil the advantages of metapopulation models for epidemic forecasting in interconnected regions. Our framework, combining network models with EKF, offers improved accuracy, resilience to missing data, and enhanced interpretability. Our methodology provides a versatile tool for global public health applications, adaptable to other diseases and geographic scales.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention on short- and medium-term dynamics of enterovirus D68 in the US 97%
- Modelling COVID-19 in the North American region with a metapopulation network and Kalman filter 96%
- Gaps in mobility data and implications for modelling epidemic spread: a scoping review and simulation study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- It’s complicated: characterizing the time-varying relationship between cell phone mobility and COVID-19 spread in the US 94%
- Fine-Grained Forecasting of COVID-19 Trends at the County Level in the United States 93%
- Generation of realistic synthetic data using multimodal neural ordinary differential equations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trade-offs between individual and ensemble forecasts of an emerging infectious disease 97%
- Estimating the effect of social inequalities in the mitigation of COVID-19 across communities in Santiago de Chile 96%
- The impact of contact tracing and household bubbles on deconfinement strategies for COVID-19: an individual-based modelling study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel, scenario-based approach to comparing non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies across nations 96%
- Impact of the representation of contact data on the evaluation of interventions in infectious diseases simulations 95%
- A semi-parametric, state-space compartmental model with time-dependent parameters for forecasting COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.