Back

Pitfalls in understanding how multiple long-term conditions cluster: whole population and age-stratified associations in 7,490,874 people in England

Romero Moreno, G.; Restocchi, V.; Lone, N.; Fleuriot, J. D.; Palmer, J.; De Ferrari, L.; Guthrie, B.

2025-02-07 health informatics
10.1101/2025.02.06.25321779 medRxiv
Show abstract

Studies of how multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) cluster together in individuals vary in the populations studied, and whether they age and/or sex stratify, which limits comparison between studies and reproducibility. This study uses a large, UK primary-care dataset to examine how pairwise strength of association between 74 conditions varies by age in both men and women aged 30-99 years, and to explore implications for MLT cluster analyses. Joint prevalence of conditions was lowest in younger age-groups and progressively increased with age, whereas Association Beyond Chance (ABC) was highest in younger age-groups and progressively decreased with age. Condition clustering based on ABC identified different clusters in all men and all women aged 30-99 years, and these clusters differed from those identified in each age-group. Researchers examining how MLTC cluster should consider whether age and sex stratification is appropriate given their study aims and/or would improve comparability and reproducibility, and explicitly justify their choices.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.