The impact of perturbation intensity schedule on improvements in reactive balance control in young adults: an experimental study

BackgroundReactive balance training (RBT) uses unanticipated perturbations to improve balance reactions and prevent falls. Intensity and predictability of perturbations may affect the generalizability of RBT, but their relative contributions remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of three RBT schedules with differing intensity and predictability on participants balance recovery following untrained perturbations, and to determine perceived difficulty and challenge of the training schedules. MethodsParticipants were 36 healthy young adults (20-35 years). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three RBT intensity schedules (fixed high intensity, low-to-high intensity, and variable intensity). Training took place on a motion platform that delivered perturbations in varying directions (forward, backward, left, and right) and intensities across five trial blocks. Balance reactions (number of recovery steps) pre- and post-training, and electrodermal responses, and perceived difficulty during training were collected. Statistical analyses compared post-training outcomes between training groups, controlling for the baseline value. ResultsParticipants took fewer steps and decreased the proportion of multi-step reactions pre- to post-training (p<0.0001), with no significant between-group differences. Perceived exertion decreased significantly across training blocks in the fixed-high group and increased significantly in the low-to-high group. Electrodermal responses declined across all groups between training blocks 1 and 3 (p=0.017). ConclusionsImprovements in step reactions to untrained perturbations did not differ between training groups, highlighting the importance of multi-directional variability over specific intensity schedules for enhancing balance recovery.