Back

Knockoff procedure improves causal gene identifications in conditional transcriptome-wide association studies

Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, H.

2025-02-08 genetics
10.1101/2025.02.05.636660 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) have been developed to nominate candidate genes associated with complex traits by integrating genome-wide association studies (GWASs) with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data. However, most existing TWAS methods evaluate the marginal association between a single gene and the trait of interest without accounting for other genes within the same genomic region or the same gene from different tissues. Additionally, false-positive gene-trait pairs can arise due to correlations with the direct effects of genetic variants. In this study, we introduce TWASKnockoff, a new knockoff-based framework for detecting causal gene-tissue pairs using GWAS summary statistics and eQTL data. Unlike marginal testing in traditional TWAS methods, TWASKnockoff examines the conditional independence for each gene-trait pair, considering both correlations in cis-predicted expression across genes and correlations between gene expression levels and genetic variants. TWASKnockoff estimates the theoretical correlation matrix for all genetic elements (cis-predicted expression across genes and genotypes for genetic variants) by averaging estimations from parametric boot-strap samples and then performs knockoff-based inference to detect causal gene-trait pairs while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR). Through empirical simulations and an application to type 2 diabetes (T2D) data, we demonstrate that TWASKnockoff achieves superior FDR control and improves the average power in detecting causal gene-trait pairs at a fixed FDR level.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.