Back

Disease as a mediator of somatic mutation-life history coevolution

Hochberg, M. E.

2025-02-07 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.02.05.636604 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multicellular organisms are confronted not only with germline mutations, but also mutations emerging in somatic cells. Somatic mutations can lead to various conditions, diseases, and cancers in particular. Somatic mutation rate is limited by evolved protection mechanisms, notably those repairing damaged DNA or eliminating mutated cells. However, in a broader context, life history traits such as body mass, age of first reproduction and reproductive lifespan, can also be subject to selection due to the negative fitness impacts of disease. Here, I analyze a simple coevolutionary model of somatic mutation rate (SMR) and fitness lifespan (hereafter called fitspan), the latter measured as the age at which inclusive fitness becomes negligible. Evolution in the model is driven by the fitness costs of disease, because as organisms age: disease is more extensive, disease prevention mechanisms are less effective and more costly, and fitness payoffs of disease prevention are lower. I investigate relations between selective forces and (co)evolutionary responses, notably showing the possibility of either monotone or oscillatory non-equilibrium dynamics and fast or slow returns to equilibrium. I then compare model predictions to recently published data on body mass, lifespan and somatic mutation rate. I show that the model (1) can explain the non-linear empirical relationship between somatic mutation and lifespan, (2) predicts the evolution of longer lifespans through a heretofore ignored feedback loop, and (3) the model is consistent with the idea that the linear relation between somatic mutation accumulation and age is the net result of mutational washing-out. I argue that the findings here generalize to other decreases in condition with age that are submitted to selection, including aging itself.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
22.2%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
4
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
9
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
15
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
17
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%