Back

Inhibiting disulphide bonding in truncated tau297-391 results in enhanced self-assembly of tau into seed-competent assemblies.

Oakley, S.; Marshall, K. E.; Meisl, G. E.; Maina, M. B.; Milton, R.; Vorley, T.; Storey, J.; Harrington, C.; WISCHIK, C. M.; Xue, W.-F.; Copsey, A.; Serpell, L.

2025-02-05 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.02.05.636249 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tau undergoes fibrillogenesis in a group of neurodegenerative diseases termed tauopathies. Each tauopathy is characterized by tau fibrils with disease-specific conformations, highlighting the complexity of tau self-assembly. This has led to debate surrounding the precise mechanisms that govern the self-assembly of tau in disease, especially the involvement of disulphide bonding (DSB) between cysteine residues. In this study, we use a truncated form of tau, dGAE, capable of forming filaments identical to those in disease. We reveal the impact of DSB in dGAE assembly and propagation by resolving the global mechanisms that dominate its assembly. We found evidence for surface-mediated secondary nucleation and fragmentation being active in dGAE assembly. The inhibition of DSB during dGAE assembly leads to an enhanced aggregation rate through a reduced lag phase, but with no effect on the global assembly mechanisms. We suggest this is due to the formation a dominant, seed-competent species in the absence of DSB that facilitates elongation and secondary nucleation resulting in enhanced assembly. In vitro seeding assays reveal the recruitment of endogenous tau in a cell model only when using dGAE species formed under conditions that inhibit DSB. Our results further support the use of the in vitro dGAE tau aggregation model for investigating the mechanism of tau assembly, the effect of varying conditions on tau assembly and how these conditions affect the resultant species. Further studies may utilise dGAE and its aggregates to investigate tau seeding, propagation and to highlight or test potential targets for therapies that reduce the spread of pathologic tau throughout the brain.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
2
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
3
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
4
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.6%
7
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
10
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
18
Journal of Neurochemistry
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
20
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
24
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
30
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%