Back

Integrated Explainable Ensemble Machine Learning Prediction of Injury Severity in Agricultural Accidents

Mermer, O.; Zhang, E.; Demir, I.

2025-02-07 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.02.05.25321769
Show abstract

Agricultural injuries remain a significant occupational hazard, causing substantial human and economic losses worldwide. This study investigates the prediction of agricultural injury severity using both linear and ensemble machine learning (ML) models and applies explainable AI (XAI) techniques to understand the contribution of input features. Data from AgInjuryNews (2015-2024) was preprocessed to extract relevant attributes such as location, time, age, and safety measures. The dataset comprised 2,421 incidents categorized as fatal or non-fatal. Various ML models, including Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting (GB), were trained and evaluated using standard performance metrics. Ensemble models demonstrated superior accuracy and recall compared to linear models, with XGBoost achieving a recall of 100% for fatal injuries. However, all models faced challenges in predicting non-fatal injuries due to class imbalance. SHAP analysis provided insights into feature importance, with age, gender, location, and time emerging as the most influential predictors across models. This research highlights the effectiveness of ensemble ML models in injury prediction while emphasizing the need for balanced datasets and XAI techniques for actionable insights. The findings have practical implications for enhancing agricultural safety and guiding policy interventions. HighlightsO_LIThis study analyzed 2,421 agricultural injury incidents from AgInjuryNews (2015- 2024) and utilized machine learning models to predict injury severity, focusing on both fatal and non-fatal outcomes. C_LIO_LIEnsemble models, such as XGBoost and Random Forest, outperformed linear models in accuracy and recall, especially in predicting fatal injuries, although challenges in non-fatal predictions due to class imbalance were observed. C_LIO_LIKey predictors identified through SHAP analysis included age, gender, location, and time, providing interpretable insights into the factors influencing injury severity. C_LIO_LIThe integration of explainable AI (XAI) enhanced the transparency of machine learning predictions, enabling stakeholders to prioritize targeted safety interventions effectively. C_LIO_LIThis research highlights the potential of combining ensemble ML models with XAI techniques to improve agricultural safety practices and provides a foundation for addressing data challenges in future studies. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=142 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25321769v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (60K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@dc19a8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@189646org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@31d6f2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16b01f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 21%
18.5%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 13%
11.1%
3
Environmental Health Perspectives
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 2%
6.9%
5
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 2%
3.1%
6
Environment International
based on 22 papers
Top 0.8%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 12%
2.6%
8
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 10%
2.5%
9
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 9%
2.0%
10
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.0%
11
BMC Research Notes
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 18%
1.4%
13
Journal of Occupational Health
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
1.4%
14
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
based on 32 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
15
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
16
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 42%
1.4%
17
American Journal of Infection Control
based on 12 papers
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
One Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
22
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 10%
0.9%
23
Patterns
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 8%
0.9%
25
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Sensors
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 0.8%
0.9%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
29
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Archives of Public Health
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
0.7%