External Validation, Re-Calibration, and Extension of a Prediction Model of Early Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Children using Multi-Center Data
Dziorny, A.; Drury, S.; Clark, A.; Farris, R. W.; Nishisaki, A.; Cornell, T. T.; Tawfik, D.; Bennett, T. D.; Shah, S. S.; Weiss, S. L.; Mohamed, T.; Shah, N.; McMahon, J.; Muthu, N.; Wetzel, R.; Zand, M. S.; Sanchez-Pinto, L. N.
Show abstract
BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is common among children with critical illness and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Risk prediction models designed for clinical decision support implementation offer an opportunity to identify and proactively mitigate AKI risks. Existing models have been primarily validated on single-center data, owing partly to the lack of appropriately detailed multicenter datasets. ObjectiveTo determine the accuracy of a single-center model to predict new AKI at 72 hours of ICU admission across two multicenter datasets and extend this model to improve prediction accuracy while maintaining acceptable alert burden. Derivation and Validation CohortsWe separately derived models in two datasets: PEDSNET-VPS, created through the linkage of PEDSnet electronic health record (EHR) extraction with Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS); and the PICU Data Collaborative dataset, created through EHR extraction and harmonization from eight participating institutions. Derivation datasets comprised temporal and location-specific spit of these datasets (80%), while the holdout test split comprised the remaining (20%). Prediction ModelWe recalibrated an existing single-center model and measured discrimination and accuracy. We then add features guided by precision and recall measures. All features were available at 12 hours of ICU admission. We measure discrimination and accuracy at multiple cut-points and identify the features contributing most to the risk score. ResultsIn two datasets comprising 186,540 ICU admissions, we report an incidence of early AKI of 2.2 - 2.7%. Initial recalibration of an existing single-center model demonstrated poor discrimination (AUROC 0.60 - 0.78). Following the addition of new features, we report higher AUROC values of 0.79 - 0.80 and AUPRC values of 0.13 - 0.21 in both datasets. We report accuracy at several cutpoints as well as cross-validate between datasets. ConclusionsIn this first use of two new multicenter datasets, we report improved discrimination and accuracy in a model designed specifically for implementation, balancing sensitivity and precision to predict patients at risk for AKI development.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 94%
- Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: a novel data-driven approach 94%
- Community-acquired pneumonia identification from electronic health records in the absence of a gold standard: a Bayesian latent class analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc): Developing an Interpretable Clinical Score for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department 97%
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 95%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 94%
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in emergency department patients: The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score (CCIS) 94%
- Development and validation of multivariable prediction models for adverse COVID-19 outcomes in IBD patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel clinical subphenotypes in COVID-19: derivation, validation, prediction, temporal patterns, and interaction with social determinants of health 92%
- Development and Prospective Implementation of a Large Language Model based System for Early Sepsis Prediction 92%
- Improving Pre-eclampsia Risk Prediction by Modeling Individualized Pregnancy Trajectories Derived from Routinely Collected Electronic Medical Record Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early prediction of impending septic shock in children using age-adjusted Sepsis-3 criteria 92%
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 91%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.