Back

A Multi-Model Ensemble Reveals Soil Carbon Gains from Regenerative Practices in the U.S. Midwest Cropland

Basso, B.; Tadiello, T.; Millar, N.; Maureira, F.; Albarenque, S.; Baer, B.; Price, L.; Sharma, P.; Villalobos, C.; Paustian, K.; Fowler, A.; Delandmeter, M.; Acutis, M.; Archontoulis, S.; Covey, K.; Doro, L.; Dumont, B.; Grace, P.; Hoogenboom, G.; Jones, J. W.; Perego, A.; Robertson, G. P.; Ruane, A.; Stockle, C.; Zhang, Y.

2025-02-08 ecology
10.1101/2025.02.04.636509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Process-based cropping systems models (CSMs) are key components of measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification (MMRV) frameworks of carbon markets, but their application suffers from model-specific differences that keep any one model from working well across all combinations of soils, climates, crops, and agronomic practices at varying scales. Multi-model ensemble (MME), successfully used to quantify soil, management and climate impact on crop productivity, provide an opportunity to better estimate changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) outcomes for agronomic practices that have the potential to mitigate SOC loss at scale. We used an MME across 46 million hectares of US Midwest cropland at a resolution of 4- km2 to assess the aggregate ability of different regenerative practices to sequester SOC at this scale compared to their dynamic baselines. MME was validated with long-term experimental data and compared to its constituent CSMs, showing greater accuracy and lower uncertainty. The results show that adopting no-till combined with cover crops increased SOC stocks by 0.36 {+/-} 0.12 Mg ha-1 yr-1 aggregated across the entire U.S. Midwest cropland. At the regional scale, this corresponds to a net SOC gain of 16.4 Tg C yr-1 compared to business-as-usual baselines. These benefits are approximately halved when each management change is practiced individually, and the modest gains are only fully realized when continued over the long-term in soils with low initial carbon stock. Results demonstrate the power of MMEs run at high resolution for providing robust estimates of environmental outcomes following agricultural practice change, and for pinpointing locations for most effective intervention. This approach can alleviate many producer carbon market participation barriers and help address market issues while ultimately supporting large-scale regenerative agriculture initiatives.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
9
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
12
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.2%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
22
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
28
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%