Oscillatory impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at very weak-intensity on the primary motor cortex: A TMS-EEG study in the human brain
Corominas-Teruel, X.; Bracco, M.; Lohof, A.; Sherrard, R.; Colomina, M. T.; Mahon, S.; Charpier, S.; Valero-Cabre, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundVery weak transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS, 10 mT, [~]0.05-10 V/m) has been explored in animal models showcasing potential for effective neuromodulation. However, the physiological effects of these type of pulsed fields remain rather unexplored in humans. ObjectiveWe here aimed to characterize the neural effects of very weak TMS pulsed fields ([~]6V/m, [~]6% of the resting motor threshold, rMT) and explore their ability to evoke and/or modulate local oscillatory activity generated on human primary motor regions. MethodsNeuronavigated TMS was employed in a cohort of healthy participants (n=18) to deliver single pulses and short bursts of rhythmic (20 Hz) TMS at very weak intensity and at conventional levels (here referred as high intensity) usually employed in human applications ([~]113V/m, [~]77% rMT), to the left primary motor cortex (M1). In parallel, their potential to evoke brain activity such as Transcranial Evoked Potentials (TEPs), and to entrain or modulate local ongoing oscillations was explored with scalp EEG recordings. ResultsBoth, single TMS pulses and 4-pulse rhythmic TMS beta (20 Hz) bursts delivered at conventional intensity elicited consistent Transcranial Evoked Potentials (TEPs) and beta-synchronized Event Related Spectral Perturbations (ERSP) around the left M1 area. Most interestingly, very-weak-intensity TMS modulated in this same area oscillatory activity at a mu-alpha frequency (7-13 Hz) only for rhythmic TMS bursts time-locked to -the troughs of the local ongoing beta oscillations. ConclusionsOur data provide first time support for the modulation of oscillatory signals with TMS delivered at an unprecedentedly weak intensity on the human primary motor cortex. This evidence enriches current knowledge on the impact of weak pulsed magnetic fields in humans, paving the way for future neurotherapeutics with a new generation of portable and autonomous low-intensity multichannel TMS devices. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIVery weak-intensity 20Hz TMS rhythmic patterns evoked significant mu-alpha central activity (7-13Hz) when bursts were aligned with the troughs of local ongoing beta oscillatory activity. C_LIO_LIConventional high-intensity single pulse and 20Hz TMS patterns elicited consistent TMS evoked potentials (TEP) and beta-synchronized local changes of Event Related Spectral Perturbations (ERSPs) in the left M1. C_LIO_LIFulfilling established criteria of TMS entrainment, the effects driven by high-intensity stimulation on M1 were TMS pattern- and oscillation-phase-dependent. Differences featured by very weak vs. conventional intensity TMS on entrained oscillatory activity suggests these two modalities operate on distinct physiological mechanisms. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 97%
- Immediate TMS-EEG responses reveal motor cortex excitability 96%
- Multimodal personalization of transcranial direct current stimulation for modulation of sensorimotor integration 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex 98%
- Reliability of resting-state EEG modulation by continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation of the primary motor cortex: A sham-controlled study 97%
- Decoding personalized motor cortical excitability states from human electroencephalography 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kilohertz Transcranial Magnetic Perturbation (kTMP): A New Non-invasive Method to Modulate Cortical Excitability 96%
- Spatially bivariate EEG-neurofeedback can manipulate interhemispheric rebalancing of M1 excitability 96%
- A different state of mind: neural activity related to volitionally up- versus downregulating cortical excitability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Double-Blind Replication Attempt of Offline 5Hz-rTUS-Induced Corticospinal Excitability 97%
- Phase-synchronized 40Hz tACS and iTBS effects on gamma oscillations 96%
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.