Machine Learning Based Classification of Aggressive and Malignant Renal Tumors from Multimodal Data
Aminy, M.; Gala, T.; Dasgupta, A.; Cen, S. Y.; Jogi, P. S.; Gill, I.; Duddalwar, V.; Oberai, A.
Show abstract
1PurposeThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine learning pipeline using multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images and clinical data to classify renal tumors as benign, malignant-indolent, or malignant-aggressive, while assessing the contribution of each data source to the classification. MethodsIn this retrospective study, 448 patients (mean age: 60.7{+/-}12.6 years, 306 male, 142 female) who underwent nephrectomy and preoperative CECT between June 2008 and July 2018 were included. Tumors were histologically categorized as benign-indolent, malignant-indolent, or malignant-aggressive. Self-supervised feature extraction converted 4-phase CECT images into 512 real-valued features, combined with clinical data and tumor size for classification. Two machine learning classifiers, random forest (RF) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP), were used to predict tumor type. Nested five-fold cross-validation was employed for hyperparameter tuning and model evaluation, and performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. ResultsThe best-performing models achieved an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93) for classifying indolent versus aggressive tumors and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.81) for benign versus malignant tumors. Models incorporating tumor size significantly improved classification accuracy. RF classifiers excelled in distinguishing indolent from aggressive tumors, while MLP classifiers performed better for benign versus malignant classification. ConclusionThe machine learning pipeline demonstrated high accuracy in differentiating aggressive from indolent renal tumors, offering valuable prognostic insights for personalized treatment. Tumor size was a critical factor, complementing CECT images and clinical data. These findings highlight the potential of ML techniques in enhancing renal tumor risk stratification.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 96%
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 94%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep learning approach for Pan-Renal Cell Carcinoma classification and survival prediction from histopathology images 95%
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 94%
- CluSA: Clustering-based Spatial Analysis framework through Graph Neural Network for Chronic Kidney Disease Prediction using Histopathology Images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 94%
- Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity: utilizing radiomics model in clinical translation 92%
- A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Single Molecule Counting Assay to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cancer and Oncocytoma in Clinics 94%
- Breast invasive ductal carcinoma classification on whole slide images with weakly-supervised and transfer learning 93%
- piNET: An Automated Proliferation Index Calculator Framework for Ki67 Breast Cancer Images 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.