Personal Diet Inference Through Mixture of Concentration Constraints and Intake Preferences
Turkia, J.; Schwab, U.; Hautamäki, V.
Show abstract
Maintaining proper nutrition is crucial for preserving health and preventing disease. However, what constitutes proper nutrition may vary among individuals; evidence indicates that the effects of diet and even single nutrients can differ considerably because of personal characteristics. This personal variability can be observed through blood markers, such as concentrations of plasma cholesterol and insulin, and captured using a hierarchical multivariate model. We leverage this variability and propose a conditional two-component Bayesian mixture model for generating personalized diet recommendations. The model uses the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023 as a prior for healthy intake and infers individualized recommendations as posterior distributions. The first component identifies dietary options predicted to produce healthy levels across all considered blood markers, while the second selects, among these valid options, the diet closest to predefined personal preferences. The preference component is configurable and, in this study, was used to minimize dietary adjustments to support recommendation adherence while providing well-defined targets for nutrients less critical to concentration regulation. The method was evaluated using nutritional data from two studies: one in prediabetic individuals and one in patients with kidney dysfunction. Numerical simulations showed that the individualized diets could restore or approach normal plasma concentrations when the estimated personal nutrient effects indicated biological feasibility. As the results align with current nutritional literature, the Bayesian approach offers a principled way to leverage observational nutrition data. However, future clinical studies are needed to validate the results and modeling approach before these can be translated into evidence-based personalized nutritional counseling.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal Analysis for Multivariate Integrated Clinical and Environmental Exposures Data 91%
- Addressing Label Noise for Electronic Health Records: Insights from Computer Vision for Tabular Data 89%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimization of nutritional strategies using a mechanistic computational model in prediabetes: Application to the J-DOIT1 study data 93%
- A methodological framework for deriving the German food-based dietary guidelines 2024: food groups, nutrient goals, and objective functions 92%
- CarbMetSim: A Discrete-Event Simulator for Carbohydrate Metabolism in Humans 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Biomarker and Survival Outcomes with the Presence of Competing Risk in Nested Case-Control Studies with Application to the TEDDY Microbiome Dataset 92%
- Incorporating Prior Knowledge into Regularized Regression 92%
- Umibato: estimation of time-varying microbial interaction using continuous-time regression hidden Markov model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adjustment for energy intake in nutritional research: a causal inference perspective 91%
- Racial/Ethnic Heterogeneity in Diet of Low-income Adult Women in the United States: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2011-2018 91%
- Dietaryindex: A User-Friendly and Versatile R Package for Standardizing Dietary Pattern Analysis in Epidemiological and Clinical Studies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.