Utilisation of genomic services among physicians in Kenya
SIGILAI, H. K.; Ogola, E.; Ilovi, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundWith advancement of genetic technology and mainstreaming of genetics into all specialties of medicine, physicians will be required to play a pivotal role in the coordination and provision of primary genetic services. ObjectiveTo describe the delivery of basic genetic services among physicians in Kenya and factors affecting integration of genomic medicine into their practice. Materials and MethodsAn online descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among registered physicians practicing within Kenya and physicians in training at University of Nairobi. A self-administered online close-ended questionnaire that assessed the following domains: delivery of genetic services, attitude and perceptions towards genetics, barriers to delivery of genomic services, knowledge of genetics and physician demographics. Simple random sampling method was used to recruit participants into the study. Interview of participants was conducted using an online close-ended questionnaire. Descriptive analysis methods were used for data analysis. The data was summarized using frequencies and proportions. ResultsThe response rate was 41% with 190 of the eligible 464 physicians completing the survey. Eighty-seven percent of respondents had not received formal training in genetics, with 80% reporting involvement in evaluation of genetic patients. Physician involvement in genetic testing and pharmacogenomics was low at 31% and 29% respectively. Sixty-four percent of the respondents graded their graded their knowledge of genetics as moderate. Participants identified limited access to medical geneticist (80%), lack of referral guidelines (86%), high cost of genetic services (93%), inadequate knowledge of genetics as barriers to genetic service delivery. ConclusionUptake of genetic service provision to patients by physician remains low due to inadequate genetics training, limited genetic specialists and prohibitive costs of genetic testing. Mitigation of these factors is required to improve genetic access to care.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feedback of Individual Genetic and Genomics Research Results: A Qualitative Study Involving Grassroots Communities in Uganda 95%
- Competency assessment of the medical interns and nurses and prevailing practices to provide family planning services in teaching hospitals in three states of India. 92%
- Assessing Knowledge, Uptake and Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women in selected communities of Wakiso District in Uganda: A population-based study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 93%
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 91%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural variability, expression profile and pharmacogenetics properties of TMPRSS2 gene as a potential target for COVID-19 therapy 90%
- Unusual profile of germline genetic variants in unselected colorectal cancer patients from a high-prevalence region in Panama 89%
- Optical Genome Mapping And Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray: An Integrated Approach For Investigating Challenging Cases Of Products Of Conception 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 92%
- Using Coincidence Analysis to Identify Causal Chains of Factors Associated with Implementation and Optimization of Lynch Syndrome Tumor Screening Across Multiple Health care Systems 90%
- ClinGen Variant Curation Interface Workshops: Training Variant Scientists on an International Platform 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.