Developing a Data Note reporting guideline for qualitative health and social care research datasets (the DeNOTE study): A study protocol
Long, H. A.; Toomey, E.; Stevenson, F.; Brooks, J. M.; Stewart, A. J.; French, D. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundData Note articles provide concise descriptions of research datasets, detailing how and why the data were created and facilitating reuse of the data. Additionally, Data Notes are typically believed to have the added value of increasing research transparency and making the data comply with the FAIR principles (i.e., Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). However, existing guidelines and templates for Data Note articles are designed for quantitative research datasets and there are no equivalents for qualitative research datasets. AimTo develop a novel reporting guideline for Data Note articles describing qualitative health and social care datasets (i.e., the DeNOTE reporting guideline). MethodsOur plans to develop the DeNOTE reporting guideline have been registered on the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. In summary, the DeNOTE study consists of (a) a rapid scoping exercise of existing literature, resources, and expert knowledge to identify and synthesise items or statements of a reporting guideline that are relevant to a Data Note article describing qualitative health and social care data, (b) an online questionnaire with expert participants to rate their agreement with items identified in (a) and to propose new or amended items, (c) an online workshop with participants to further co-develop the reporting items, with the aim to reach consensus on the items, (d) eliciting feedback from participants on the draft reporting guideline, and (e) finalising the DeNOTE reporting guideline. ConclusionOur goal is to produce a novel reporting guideline to support researchers when producing a Data Note article describing qualitative health and social care research data. In the process, we will produce tailored open research infrastructure to better support qualitative researchers engaging in open research practices.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 96%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 95%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 93%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 92%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating implementation of LEAPS, a youth-led early childhood care and education intervention in rural Pakistan: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 92%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 92%
- Operational Strategies among Infectious Disease Clinical Trial Sites During Pandemics: A Scoping Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 93%
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 93%
- An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study and modified Delphi approach 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.