Back

Dynamical repertoire of brain networks in mindfulness cognitive behavioural therapy during rumination: A randomized controlled trial

Vohryzek, J.; van der Velden, A. M.; Kuyken, W.; Montero-Marin, J.; Collin, G.; Kringelbach, M. L.; Ruhe, E.

2025-02-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.02.04.25321569 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDDepression is a prevalent and debilitating affective disorder characterised by the dominance and persistence of depressive rumination. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is an effective treatment for recurrent depression developed specifically to target rumination and recurrence risk by training metacognitive awareness and adaptive attention, emotion and self-regulation skills. Yet, the underlying mechanisms by which mindfulness training impacts maladaptive depressive rumination is not well understood, and a deeper understanding of its effects on the complex brain dynamics during depressive rumination is needed. METHODIn a randomised controlled functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study (N = 80), we used LEiDA (Leading Eigenvector Dynamics Analysis) to determine the key substates during resting state fMRI of an experimentally induced rumination state before and after treatment with MBCT (N = 27) for recurrent depression in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone (N = 21). We determined the probability of occurrence (fractional occupancy) and the duration (lifetime) of underlying substates (phase-locking patterns) before and after treatment for both groups. RESULTSWe found that MBCT training compared with TAU altered the fractional occupancy of a Salience-somatomotor substate during the depressive rumination induction. These dynamic network changes in turn were associated with reduced depressive symptoms after treatment and at three months follow up. CONCLUSIONIn a depressive ruminative state, changes in the dynamics of the somatosensory-salience network following mindfulness training was associated with improved clinical outcomes which provides insight into candidate brain mechanisms or markers of treatment response. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03353493.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.