Back

Active surveillance of cats and dogs from households with human COVID-19 cases reveals over one quarter of pets infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020-2021 in Texas, United States

Pauvolid-Correa, A.; Davila, E.; Auckland, L.; Zecca, I. B.; Busselman, R. E.; Tang, W.; Roundy, C. M.; Killian, M. L.; Torchetti, M. K.; Jenkins-Moore, M.; Robbe-Austerman, S.; Lantz, K.; Mozingo, K.; Tell, R.; Lim, A.; Akpalu, Y.; Fischer, R. S. B.; Ferreira, F. C.; Hamer, G. L.; Hamer, S. A.

2025-02-04 microbiology
10.1101/2025.02.03.636361 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Households where people have COVID-19 are high risk environments for companion animals that are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. We sampled 579 pets from 281 households with one or more laboratory-confirmed person with COVID-19 in central Texas from June 2020 to May 2021. Nineteen out of 396 (4.8%) dogs and 21 out of 157 (13.4%) cats were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR. Additionally, 95/382 (25%) dogs and 52/146 (36%) cats harbored SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. Twenty-six companion animals of ten other species were negative. Overall, 164 (29%) pets were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by molecular and/or serological tests; a total of 110 (39%) out of 281 households had at least one animal with active or past SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cats were more likely to be infected by SARS-CoV-2 and had higher endpoint antibody titers than dogs. Through viral isolation from a subset of respiratory swabs, we documented 6 different lineages in dogs and cats, including the B.1.1 lineage in a cat one month prior to the first known human case in the country. We observed animal and human-pet interaction factors associated with higher risk of infection for dogs and cats, such as days after COVID-19 diagnosis and sharing food. Frequency of clinical signs of disease reported by owners of pets with active infections did not differ from uninfected ones, suggesting that not all reported signs are attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Characterizing animal infections using active SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in pets at risk of infection may aid in One Health pandemic prevention, response, and management.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.3%
2
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
8
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
9
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
11
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
17
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
21
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
22
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%