Generalizable Prediction of Alzheimer Disease Pathologies with a Scalable Annotation Tool and an High-Accuracy Model
Gopal Ramaswamy, V.; Ahirwar, M.; Ryan, G.; Dugger, B. N.; Al Dalahmah, O.; Signaevski, M.; Purohit, D. P.; Haroutunian, V.; Finkbeiner, S.
Show abstract
Characterizing the cardinal neuropathologies in Alzheimer disease (AD) can be laborious, time consuming, and susceptible to intra- and inter-observer variability. The lack of high throughput unbiased approaches to reliably assess neuropathology hampers efforts to use pathology as a means to link clinical features of AD to molecular pathogenesis in the ever-growing datasets of persons with AD. To remove this roadblock, we designed an annotation tool in addition to a computational pipeline to analyze digital microscopic images of postmortem tissue from persons with AD in a fully automated and unbiased manner in only a fraction of the time taken with conventional approaches and allows neuropathological analyses and lesion quantification at multiple scales. The pipeline includes a Mask Regional-Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) we trained to detect, classify, and segment different types of amyloid. To establish ground truth for training and validation, we utilized an existing open source platform, QuPath, and developed a tool to collect consensus annotations of neuropathology experts. The Mask R-CNN identified amyloid pathology in samples (with accuracy: 94.6%, F1: 87.7%, Dice: 81.8%) unrelated to the training dataset, indicating that it detects generalizable pathology features. Its quantitative measurements of amyloid pathology on 298 samples correlated with the severity of AD neuropathology assessed by experts and neuropathologists (CERAD ratings) and estimates of cognitive compromise (Clinical Dementia Ratings (CDR)). Our computational pipeline should enable rapid, unbiased, inexpensive, quantitative, and comprehensive neuropathological analysis of large tissue collections and integration with orthogonal clinical and multi-omic measurements.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-driven fusion of neurological work-up for assessment of biological Alzheimer’s disease 97%
- STAIG: Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis via Image-Aided Graph Contrastive Learning for Domain Exploration and Alignment-Free Integration 95%
- Molecular Signatures of Resilience to Alzheimer's Disease in Neocortical Layer 4 Neurons 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning fast and fine-grained detection of amyloid neuropathologies from coarse-grained expert labels 98%
- Detecting the effect of genetic diversity on brain composition in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model 95%
- MIM-CyCIF: Masked Imaging Modeling for Enhancing Cyclic Immunofluorescence (CyCIF) with Panel Reduction and Imputation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining and predicting transdiagnostic categories of neurodegenerative disease 95%
- Neuroimaging-AI Endophenotypes of Brain Diseases in the General Population: Towards a Dimensional System of Vulnerability 92%
- Scalable projected Light Sheet Microscopy for high-resolution imaging of living and cleared samples 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthesizing Images of Tau Pathology from Cross-modal Neuroimaging using Deep Learning 96%
- Development and validation of a deep learning framework for Alzheimers disease classification 95%
- Selective vulnerability and resilience to Alzheimer's disease tauopathy as a function of genes and the connectome 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.