Back

Usefulness of autofluorescence detection of the parathyroid glands with PTeye system. Scope review

Refoyo, J. L. P.; Pelaez, B. P.

2025-02-03 otolaryngology
10.1101/2025.02.01.25321520 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction and ObjectiveNear-infrared (NIR) fluorescence is used to visualize anatomical structures and physiological activities in real time. The objective is to synthesize the advantages and disadvantages of the PTeye system in the identification of parathyroid glands during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. MethodA literature review of the scope of primary research articles in databases such as PubMed, WoS and Cochrane was carried out, using the search strategy "(autofluorescence AND (parathyroid glands)) AND PTeye" until January 27, 2025. We included studies with any methodology that evaluated the identification of parathyroid glands with autofluorescence in thyroid or parathyroid surgery with PTeye technology. Review articles, editorials, and individual clinical cases were excluded. ResultsWe included 8 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that PTeye has high accuracy in identifying parathyroid glands, with identification rates above 90%. The use of PTeye reduced the need for additional tests such as freeze biopsies and increased the surgeons confidence in identifying parathyroid tissue. However, some false positives were identified, including thyroid nodules and lymph nodes. The device proved to be easy to use and provided real-time feedback. ConclusionsPTeye is a useful tool to improve the identification of parathyroid glands during surgery, increasing surgeon confidence and reducing the rate of postoperative hypocalcemia. Although it has some disadvantages, such as the possibility of false positives and the need for a learning curve, its benefits outweigh these limitations. More studies are needed to confirm these findings and assess their long-term impact.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.4%
2
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.5%
3
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.6%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
8
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
24
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
25
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%