Back

The influence of anatomical shape variations of wrist bones on kinematic parameter extraction in CT scans

Haenen, M.; Hummelink, S.; Karstanje, E.; Sechopoulos, I.; Van der Heijden, B.

2025-02-04 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.01.31.25321391 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionFour-Dimensional Computed Tomography (4DCT) shows promise in diagnosing wrist pathologies such as scapholunate ligament lesions (SLL). Two parameters indicative of SLL lesions in these scans, the scapholunate angle (SLA) and the capitolunate angle (CLA), might be affected by anatomical shape variations. Therefore, this study characterizes the impact of anatomical shape variations on SLA and CLA estimates from 4DCT scans. Methods3D CT images retrieved from 4DCT scans of healthy wrists were used. Scans were automatically segmented using an Artificial Intelligence-based algorithm. A statistical shape model (SSM) was created for each bone separately. The quality of each SSM was assessed using a leave-one-out approach by calculating the root mean squared error (RMSE). Next, local coordinate systems (LCSs) were assigned to the SSMs while shape variations were introduced. The rotational deviation of the LCSs was calculated by a combined rotation around the three axes. Finally, the SLAs and CLAs were calculated for all possible bone shape combinations. ResultsSSMs of the carpal bones and radius were created using 106 and 99 scans, respectively, with a maximum RMSE across all SSMs of 0.65 mm. The 95th percentile of the rotational deviations of the LCSs of the carpal bones and radius were below 3{degrees}. The resulting uncertainty due to anatomical variations in the calculation of the SLA and CLA was 2-3{degrees}. ConclusionAnatomical shape variations hardly influence the SLA, CLA, and LCSs of the carpal bones and radius so the methods to estimate the LCSs can be used to estimate relevant kinematic parameters in 4DCT scans.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.