Back

Geometric influences on the regional organization of the mammalian brain

Pang, J. C.; Robinson, P. A.; Aquino, K. M.; Levi, P. T.; Holmes, A.; Markicevic, M.; Shen, X.; Funck, T.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Kong, R.; Yeo, B. T. T.; Tiego, J.; Bellgrove, M. A.; Constable, R. T.; Lake, E. M.; Breakspear, M.; Fornito, A.

2025-02-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.30.635820 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mammalian brain is comprised of anatomically and functionally distinct regions. Substantial work over the past century has pursued construction of ever-more accurate maps of regional boundaries, using either expert judgement or data-driven clustering of functional, connectional, and/or architectonic properties. However, these approaches are often purely descriptive, have limited generalizability, and do not elucidate the underlying generative mechanisms that shape the regional organization of the brain. Here, we develop a novel approach that leverages a simple, hierarchical principle for generating a multiscale parcellation of any brain structure in any mammalian species using only its geometry. We show that this approach yields regions at any resolution scale that are more homogeneous than those defined in nearly all existing benchmark brain parcellations in use today across hundreds of anatomical, functional, cellular, and molecular brain properties measured in humans, macaques, marmosets, and mice. We additionally show how our method can be generalized to previously unstudied mammalian species for which no parcellations exist. Finally, we demonstrate how our approach captures the essence of a simple, hierarchical reaction-diffusion mechanism, in which the geometry of a brain structure shapes the spatial expression of putative patterning molecules linked to the formation of distinct regions through development. Our findings point to a highly conserved and universal influence of geometry on the regional organization of the mammalian brain.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.