Back

Encoding of visual stimuli and behavioral goals in distinct anatomical areas of monkey ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

Basile, C.; Gerbella, M.; Gravante, A.; Lapadula, A.; Roda, F.; Simone, L.; Fogassi, L.; Rozzi, S.

2025-01-30 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.30.635437 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The lateral prefrontal cortex has been classically defined as an associative region involved in the so-called executive functions, such as guiding behavior based on abstract rules and mnemonic information. However, most neurophysiological studies on monkeys did not address the issue of whether distinct anatomical sectors of lateral prefrontal cortex play different functional roles. The main aim of this work is to study functional properties of neurons recorded from a large part of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPF) of two monkeys performing passive visual tasks and a visuo-motor task, and to map them on the anatomical areas defined on the basis of our recent parcellations. Our results show that distinct VLPF areas differently contribute to visual processing and action organization along the caudo-rostral axis. In particular, the processing of visual stimuli, independent of whether passively presented or exploited for guiding behavior, primarily involves posterior VLPF areas (especially caudal area 12r), while the elaboration of visual and contextual information for action organization mainly involves intermediate VLPF areas (especially middle 46v). In this latter sector, visual stimuli/instructions appear to be encoded in a pragmatic format, that is in terms of the associated behavioral outcome. Finally, more anterior areas are characterized by a low responsiveness to the employed tasks. Altogether, our findings indicate that posterior VLPF areas represent the first processing stage of visual input, intermediate areas primarily contribute to the selection and planning of contextually appropriate behaviors, while rostral areas could be involved in more complex abstract processes.

Published in PLOS Biology (predicted rank #21) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.8%
2
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.5%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.6%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 23%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.3%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
9
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
10
Progress in Neurobiology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
12
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
19
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
PLOS Biology · published here
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
22
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
24
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%