Back

Single-AAV CRISPR editing of skeletal muscle in non-human primates with NanoCas, an ultracompact nuclease

Rauch, B. J.; DeLoughery, A.; Sper, R.; Chen, S.; Yunanda, S.; Masnaghetti, M.; Chai, N.; Lin, J. C.; Neckelmann, A.; Bjornson, Y.; Espino, D. P.; Sancio, A.; Schmitt, C.; Scholes, C.; Shah, R.; Narendra, P. K.; Ansaloni, S.; Tan, S.; Rukmini, S. J.; Somaiah, S.; Suresh, S.; Minami, S.; Tymoshenko, S.; Wright, W.; Xu, S.; Broughton, J.; Retwitzer, M. D.; Bobbin, M.; Yuan, D.; Abe, K.; DeWitt, M.; Zhang, B.; Harrington, L. B.

2025-01-30 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.01.29.635576 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CRISPR gene editing is a transformative technology for addressing genetic diseases, but delivery constraints have largely limited its therapeutic applications to liver-targeted and ex vivo therapies. Here, we present the discovery and engineering of NanoCas, an ultracompact CRISPR nuclease capable of extending CRISPRs reach in vivo beyond liver targets. We experimentally screened 176 ultracompact CRISPR systems found in metagenomic data and applied protein engineering approaches to enhance the editing efficiency of NanoCas. The optimized NanoCas exhibits potent editing capabilities across various cell systems and tissues in vivo when administered via adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors. This is accomplished despite NanoCas being approximately one-third the size of conventional CRISPR nucleases. In proof-of-concept experiments, we observed robust editing with our optimized NanoCas in mouse models targeting Pcsk9, a gene involved in cholesterol regulation, and targeting exon splice sites in dystrophin to address Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) mutations. We further tested the efficacy of our NanoCas system in vivo in non-human primates (NHPs) resulting in editing levels above 30% in muscle tissues. The compact size of NanoCas, in combination with robust nuclease editing, opens the door for single-AAV editing of non-liver tissues in vivo, including the use of newer editing modalities such as reverse transcriptase (RT) editing, base editing, and epigenetic editing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.