Back

Direct Retinal Imaging for Shock Resuscitation in Critical Ill Adults II (D-RISC II)

Cooper, G.; Burke, J.; Hamid, C.; Godden, E.; Dhaun, N.; King, S.; MacGillivray, T. J.; Baillie, J. K.; Griffith, D.; MacCormick, I. J. C.

2025-01-31 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.01.29.25321350 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundShock involves microcirculatory dysfunction that is not suitably captured well by measurements of large vessels, such as systemic blood pressure. The outer retinal microcirculation (the choroid) can be measured non-invasively and may reflect dysfunction in other organs. We tested the feasibility of measuring the retinal choroid in an intensive care setting and explored associations between choroidal measurements and severity of disease. MethodsWe performed optical coherence tomography on patients admitted to the intensive treatment unit, and repeated imaging once 12-72 hours later. We measured choroidal anatomy using automated image segmentation, compared this to routine clinical data, and described change over time. ResultsOf fifteen patients recruited, 80% (12) had successful baseline imaging and 40% (6) of these had follow-up imaging within intensive care. At baseline, patients with thicker choroids and larger vascularity had larger cumulative fluid balance, and lower disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) score, haematocrit, and albumin. A measurable suprachoroidal space was seen in 75% (9) patients and the size of this space tended to be larger in patients with lower heart rates. There was substantial intraindividual variation in choroidal measurements over time. CommentMeasuring the retinal choroid is feasible in patients with critical illness. Exploratory associations with systemic variables suggest that the choroid may provide information about the microvascular function of other major organs. Size and change of choroidal measurements may reflect perfusion pressure or vascular leak in response to inflammation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
5
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
13
Angiogenesis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%