Distinctive Occupancy of Brain Coupling Modes across Autism spectrum subtypes
Miguel, V.; Farinha, M.; Deleglise, A.; Vohryzek, J.; Cruzat, J.; Hancock, F.; Stark, E.; Morgado, P.; Deco, G.; Kringelbach, M. L.; Cabral, J.
Show abstract
Withdrawal statementThe authors have withdrawn this manuscript due to ethical considerations regarding the classification and nomenclature of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) subtypes used in our analysis of the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) dataset. While the statistical methods and analysis techniques employed in the study remain valid, recent discussions in the field regarding the appropriate terminology and classification of ASD (Bearer et al., 2024) have led us to reconsider the framework of our research. As this manuscript no longer aligns with current ethical standards in ASD research, this work should not be cited as a reference. For any questions or clarifications, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for a Compensatory Relationship between Left- and Right-Lateralized Brain Networks 95%
- Individual patterns of functional connectivity in neonates as revealed by surface-based Bayesian modeling 95%
- Individual connectivity-based parcellations reflect functional properties of human auditory cortex 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural control energy of resting-state functional brain states reveals inefficient brain dynamics in psychosis vulnerability. 96%
- Robust hierarchically organized whole-brain patterns of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders observed after Personalized Intrinsic Network Topography 96%
- Energy of functional brain states correlates with cognition in adolescent-onset schizophrenia and healthy persons 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.