Back

Human in vivo footprints from blood plasma samples for improved diagnostics in septic patients

Sonntag, M.; Mueller, J.; Brenner, T.; Decker, S. O.; von Haeseler, A.; Sohn, K.; German Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Trials Group (GAIN-CARE),

2025-01-29 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.01.29.25320179
Show abstract

BackgroundLiquid biopsy based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an established approach in clinical diagnostics. In recent years, a fraction of cfDNA comprising short fragments has been discovered, that is enriched at gene promoters and binding sites of DNA-binding proteins. However, the diagnostic potential of such short double-stranded cell-free DNA (footprint DNA) remains to be fully explored. Therefore, we characterized the clinical utility of footprint DNA in septic patients. MethodsWe enriched for footprint DNA based on size selection and subsequent high-throughput DNA sequencing to receive an unbiased, genome-wide picture of the host response to the infection. Footprint DNA occupancies were analyzed for correlation with clinical metrics including urea, hemoglobin, or alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Additionally, footprint DNA markers were benchmarked by read and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis against procalcitonin (PCT) as an established marker for infection status as well as against clinical parameters for early death prediction. FindingsWe found that levels of occupancy of footprint DNA at defined genomic loci semi-quantitatively correlated with physiological markers like ALT or urea from major organ systems including liver or kidney. In a small proof-of-concept cohort, differential signatures of DNA footprints distinguished between patient groups with bacterial and viral infections with an area under the ROC (AUROC) of 1.0, which is considerably better than PCT with an AUROC of 0.75. Likewise, footprint DNA could also predict early death in septic patients with an AUROC of 0.983, compared to the SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score with an AUROC of 0.76. InterpretationOur findings show that footprint DNA delivers quantitative information on physiology at the DNA level, demonstrating its diagnostic and prognostic potential. Identified footprint biomarker regions could be helpful in the clinical assessment of septic patients and other complex diseases outperforming current state-of-the-art clinical diagnostics. FundingThis study was financed with internal funds from Fraunhofer society.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 7%
13.4%
2
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 67%
5.2%
5
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
4.6%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 3%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 20%
3.0%
9
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 7%
3.0%
10
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Critical Care Explorations
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 6%
1.6%
13
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
15
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
19
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
based on 23 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Bioinformatics
based on 24 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Blood Advances
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Life Science Alliance
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 11%
0.7%