Back

Impact of sucrose sinks on phloem transport

Nakad, M.; Weng, E.; Gentine, P.

2025-01-31 ecology
10.1101/2025.01.28.635320 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The movement of photosynthates within plants is a focus in plant physiology, ecohydrology, and earth systems modeling. The phloem, one of the plants hydraulic systems, facilitates this transport. It is believed to be optimized for efficient photosynthates transport, notably sucrose. This has implications ranging from local impacts on plant survival during drought to ecosystem-scale effects on carbon and water cycling. Most models for phloem transport rely on the pressure-flow hypothesis, where sucrose is loaded in leaves, drawing water from the xylem through osmosis, generating pressure gradients for transport. Experimental challenges in measuring sugar fluxes have led to reliance on theoretical models, though discrepancies exist, especially for long-distance transport. Criticism of the pressure-flow hypothesis notes low hydraulic conductance in sieve tubes, possibly hindering sucrose transport in taller plants. This research explores osmotically driven flows through the development of a new one-dimensional numerical model that includes sources from photosynthesis and sinks towards the stem and roots. The model also incorporates a concentration-dependent viscosity and the xylem water potential. It shows that different allocation schemes of sucrose sinks towards the stem of the plant influence the speed at which sucrose is transported. These findings provide insight into how carbon allocation along the phloem may have evolved to enhance the efficiency of transporting soluble compounds in the phloem. HighlightsO_LISucrose sinks along the phloem influence mass flux beyond simple reaction-like consumption dynamics C_LIO_LIMass flux is modulated by the sucrose allocation profile along the tree stem C_LIO_LIObservations of xylem-phloem water exchange can provide insights into the physical sucrose sink profile C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.