TiDHy: Timescale Demixing via Hypernetworks to learn simultaneous dynamics from mixed observations
Abe, E. T. T.; Brunton, B. W.
Show abstract
Neural activity and behavior arise from multiple concurrent time-varying systems, including neuromodulation, neural state, and history; however, most current approaches model these data as one set of dynamics with a single timescale. Here we develop Timescale Demixing via Hypernetworks (TiDHy) as a new computational method to model spatiotemporal data, decomposing them into multiple simultaneous latent dynamical systems that may span orders-of-magnitude different timescales. Specifically, we train a hyper-network to dynamically reweigh linear combinations of latent dynamics. This approach enables accurate data reconstruction, converges to true latent dynamics, and captures multiple timescales of variation. We first demonstrate that TiDHy can demix dynamics and timescales from synthetic data comprising multiple independent switching linear dynamical systems, even when the observations are mixed. Next, with a simulated locomotion behavior dataset, we show that TiDHy accurately captures both the fast dynamics of movement kinematics and the slow dynamics of changing terrains. Finally, in an open-source multi-animal social behavior dataset, we show that the keypoint trajectory dynamics extracted with TiDHy can be used to accurately identify social behaviors of multiple mice. Taken together, TiDHy is a powerful new algorithm for demixing simultaneous latent dynamical systems with applications to diverse computational domains.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell Multi-Modal GAN (scMMGAN) reveals spatial patterns in single-cell data from triple negative breast cancer 95%
- Tokenized and Continuous Embedding Compressions of Protein Sequence and Structure 94%
- Generating hard-to-obtain information from easy-to-obtain information: applications in drug discovery and clinical inference 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.