Back

multiHIVE: Hierarchical Multimodal Deep Generative Model for Single-cell Multiomics Integration

Nanduri, A.; Musale, K. P.; Pandey, K.; Zafar, H.

2025-01-29 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.01.28.635222 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationRecently developed single-cell multiomics technologies are enhancing our understanding of cellular heterogeneity by providing multiple views of a biological system. CITE-seq (cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing) is one such multiomics assay, with the ability to connect cell states to functions by simultaneously profiling RNA and surface proteins from the same cell. However, the distinct technical characteristics of these data modalities pose significant challenges to their integration into a cohesive representation of cellular identity. ResultsHere we present multiHIVE, a hierarchical multimodal deep generative model for inferring cellular embeddings by integrating CITE-seq data modalities. multiHIVE employs hierarchically stacked latent variables as well as modality-specific latent variables to capture shared and private information from the modalities respectively, facilitating integration, denoising and imputation tasks. Extensive benchmarking using gold-standard real and simulated datasets demonstrates multiHIVEs superiority in integrating CITE-seq datasets. Moreover, multiHIVE outperformed the state-of-the-art methods in imputing missing protein measurements and integration of CITE-seq dataset with unimodal dataset. Using a thymocyte development dataset, we showed that multiHIVEs cellular embeddings can lead to improved trajectory inference and gene trend identification. Finally, using datasets across development and disease, we demonstrated that factorization of multiHIVE-inferred denoised expression into gene expression programs aids in identifying biological processes at multiple levels of cellular hierarchy. Availability and ImplementationmultiHIVE is implemented in Python and is publicly available at https://github.com/Zafar-Lab/multiHIVE.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.