Back

Continuous Neural Correlates of Imbalanced Reinforcement Learning in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Healthy Individuals

Sakai, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Abe, Y.; Narumoto, J.; Tanaka, S. C.

2025-01-30 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.28.635211 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by imbalanced reinforcement learning. This study investigated neural correlates of this imbalance by examining resting-state functional connectivity (rs-fMRI) in non-medicated OCD patients and healthy controls (HCs) exhibiting varying degrees of memory trace imbalance. MethodsWe employed network-based statistics (NBS), suitable for identifying network-level alterations of rs-fMRI data from 49 OCD patients and 53 HCs (Core Discovery Dataset: Core-DS) to identify a significant network. We validated this network in an independent dataset of 10 OCD patients and 18 HCs (Independent Validation Dataset: IndV-DS). Additionally, we compared functional connectivity in the identified network between subgroups of HCs with imbalanced (OCD-like) and balanced learning profiles (Extension Dataset: Ext-DS; n=10 each). ResultsNBS identified an OCD network with increased connectivity in OCD patients (padjusted = 0.022), comprising regions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), parietal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, and hippocampal formation. This networks increased connectivity in OCD patients was replicated in IndV-DS (p = 0.0027). Importantly, imbalanced HCs showed a significant increase in functional connectivity, particularly between the DLPFC and presubiculum, in the identified OCD network, compared to balanced HCs (p = 0.0051, padjusted = 0.066). ConclusionIncreased functional connectivity in the OCD network, especially between the DLPFC and presubiculum, is present in both OCD patients and a subgroup of HCs with learning imbalances. These findings provide evidence for a continuous neural basis of imbalanced reinforcement learning, suggesting a continuum of traits associated with OCD between patients and "healthy" individuals.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.