Back

Synergistic olfactory nerve input and cholinergic neuromodulation can activate ERK in rat olfactory bulb vasopressin cells

Reichardt, N.; Kindler, L.; Pino, E.; Lukas, M.; Egger, V.; Suyama, H.

2025-01-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.28.635198 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Social discrimination in rats relies on vasopressin cells (VPCs) intrinsic to the olfactory bulb (OB). We had observed that VPCs responded to electrical stimulation of the olfactory nerve in acute OB slices with inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, and that the neuromodulator acetylcholine could revert these responses to excitation, resulting in action potentials (AP). Moreover, in behaving rats that were exposed to conspecifics, more VPCs were immunopositive to the neural activity marker pERK (pERK+ VPC) than in control rats. However, it is unclear whether these two observations, the increased ERK activation in vivo, and the generation of APs in the presence of ACh in vitro, can be actually mapped onto each other. Here we investigated ERK activation in acute OB slices from transgenic VP-eGFP rats upon either chemical stimulation or tetanic olfactory nerve stimulation. Both KCl and NMDA stimulation resulted in substantial pERK induction across bulbar layers and caused VPC spiking in whole-cell recordings, but only NMDA slightly increased pERK+ VPC percentage. Tetanic olfactory nerve stimulation yielded localized, column-like ERK activation of neurons across bulbar layers. The presence of ACh during tetanic stimulation substantially and specifically increased percentages of pERK+ VPCs within columns, indicating that columnar pERK+ VPCs were preferentially activated by coincident cholinergic neuromodulation and synaptic input. Our results validate pERK induction as a tool to monitor synaptic VPC excitation in the OB, and imply that depolarization of VPCs alone is insufficient to activate ERK. We propose that synaptically evoked APs are a prerequisite for pERK induction in VPCs.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Chemical Senses
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
9
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.6%
11
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
12
Journal of Neurochemistry
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
14
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.2%
15
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
Molecular Neurobiology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%