Accurate Characterization of the Allosteric Energy Landscapes, Binding Hotspots and Long-Range Communications for KRAS Complexes with Effector Proteins : Integrative Approach Using Microsecond Molecular Dynamics, Deep Mutational Scanning of Binding Energetics and Allosteric Network Modeling
Xiao, S.; Alshahrani, M.; Hu, G.; Tao, P.; Verkhivker, G.
Show abstract
KRAS is a pivotal oncoprotein that regulates cell proliferation and survival through interactions with downstream effectors such as RAF1. Oncogenic mutations in KRAS, including G12V, G13D, and Q61R, drive constitutive activation and hyperactivation of signaling pathways, contributing to cancer progression. Despite significant advances in understanding KRAS biology, the structural and dynamic mechanisms of KRAS binding and allostery by which oncogenic mutations enhance KRAS-RAF1 binding and signaling remain incompletely understood. In this study, we employ microsecond molecular dynamics simulations, Markov State Modeling, mutational scanning and binding free energy calculations together with dynamic network modeling to elucidate the effect of KRAS mutations and characterize the thermodynamic and allosteric drivers and hotspots of KRAS binding and oncogenic activation. Our simulations revealed that oncogenic mutations stabilize the open active conformation of KRAS by differentially modulating the flexibility of the switch I and switch II regions, thereby enhancing RAF1 binding affinity. The G12V mutation rigidifies both switch I and switch II, locking KRAS in a stable, active state. In contrast, the G13D mutation moderately reduces switch I flexibility while increasing switch II dynamics, restoring a balance between stability and flexibility. The Q61R mutation induces a more complex conformational landscape, characterized by the increased switch II flexibility and expansion of functional macrostates, which promotes prolonged RAF1 binding and signaling. Mutational scanning of KRAS-RAF1 complexes identified key binding affinity hotspots, including Y40, E37, D38, and D33, and together with the MM-GBSA analysis revealed the hotspots leverage synergistic electrostatic and hydrophobic binding interactions in stabilizing the KRAS-RAF1 complexes. Network-based analysis of allosteric communication identifies critical KRAS residues (e.g., L6, E37, D57, R97) that mediate long-range interactions between the KRAS core and the RAF1 binding interface. The central {beta}-sheet of KRAS emerges as a hub for transmitting conformational changes, linking distant functional sites and facilitating allosteric regulation. Strikingly, the predicted allosteric hotspots align with experimentally identified allosteric binding hotspots that define the energy landscape of KRAS allostery. This study highlights the power of integrating computational modeling with experimental data to unravel the complex dynamics of KRAS and its mutants. The identification of binding hotspots and allosteric communication routes offers new opportunities for developing targeted therapies to disrupt KRAS-RAF1 interactions and inhibit oncogenic signaling. Our results underscore the potential of computational approaches to guide the design of allosteric inhibitors and mutant-specific therapies for KRAS-driven cancers.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Mutational Scanning of Dynamic Interaction Networks in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Complexes: Allosteric Hotspots Control Functional Mimicry and Resilience to Mutational Escape 98%
- Markov State Models and Perturbation-Based Approaches Reveal Distinct Dynamic Signatures and Hidden Allosteric Pockets in the Emerging SARS-Cov-2 Spike Omicron Variants Complexes with the Host Receptor: The Interplay of Dynamics and Convergent Evolution Modulates Allostery and Functional Mechanisms 98%
- Towards In Situ Dynamics of DNA-bound Full-Length p53 Tetramer 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular Mechanism of Brassinosteroids Perception by the Plant Growth Receptor BRI1 97%
- Coevolutionary Analysis and Perturbation-Based Network Modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Complexes with Antibodies: Binding-Induced Control of Dynamics, Allosteric Interactions and Signaling 96%
- Microtubule severing enzymes oligomerization and allostery: a tale of two domains 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic Profiling of Binding and Allosteric Propensities of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein with Different Classes of Antibodies: Mutational and Perturbation-Based Scanning Reveal Allosteric Duality of Functionally Adaptable Hotspots 97%
- A linear response theory based method for prediction of large scale protein conformational changes upon ligand binding 96%
- Ligand Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics 2 (LiGaMD2): Improved calculations of ligand binding thermodynamics and kinetics with closed protein pocket 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Perturbation-Based Modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Binding with Host Receptor and Neutralizing Antibodies : Structurally Adaptable Allosteric Communication Hotspots Define Spike Sites Targeted by Global Circulating Mutations 98%
- A major disease-related point mutation in spastin alters dramatically the dynamics and allostery of the motor 97%
- Oncogenic mutations in the DNA-binding domain of FOXO1 disrupt folding: quantitative insights from experiments and molecular simulations 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.