Back

Large interspecific and intraspecific variation in seed longevity in storage

Klepka, L.; Liepelt, S.; Bucharova, A.

2025-01-27 ecology
10.1101/2025.01.27.635048 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PremiseConservation seed banks are essential for ex-situ plant conservation, but stored seeds slowly deteriorate and lose viability. Seed longevity in storage is determined by the initial seed viability and the rate of seed viability loss. The rate of seed viability loss in storage varies between species, and there is possibly also some variation between populations or even genotypes within species. However, the extent of this intraspecific variability and its drivers remain unclear. MethodsWe investigated both inter- and intraspecific variability in seed longevity and its predictors in 41 common grassland species and 188 seed accessions from across Europe. We exposed the seeds to artificial ageing conditions (60% RH, 45{degrees}C) and used probit analysis to obtain the rate of seed viability loss ({sigma}) as a measure of seed longevity. We then related {sigma} to both accession- and species-specific factors. Key resultsSeed longevity ({sigma}) varied significantly among accessions within 58% of the species, and the probability of detecting such intraspecific differences increased with the number of accessions available for a given species. This suggests that within-species variation in seed longevity is widespread. Accession-specific predictors explained only 14.4% of the within-species variability. Specifically, seed longevity increased with the mean annual temperature at the accession origin and decreased with the accession-specific seed weight. Across species, seed longevity differed among plant families but was unrelated to seed weight or seed chemical composition. ConclusionsOur findings highlight substantial within-species variation in seed longevity in storage, which, however, is difficult to predict.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.