Back

Legacy effects of European colonialism on hotspots of biocultural diversity threat

Lenzner, B.; Baumann, A.; Norder, S.; Essl, F.; Fellner, H. A.

2025-01-28 ecology
10.1101/2025.01.27.635019 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Patterns of biological diversity have been shaped by cultural practices in the past, while in turn, cultures and languages have evolved in close interaction with local species and ecosystems. However, in the Anthropocene, humans are putting increasingly more and diverse pressures on ecosystems and cultures resulting in accelerating threat levels on both. Understanding where biological and linguistic diversity (a common measure of cultural diversity) is threatened globally, and which drivers shape their distribution is crucial for pinpointing hotspots and prioritizing efforts to counter these threats. We find that the spatial patterns of the erosion of biological and cultural diversity are weakly congruent on a global scale and that they are driven by differential sets of mechanisms. However, our results also indicate that particularly large-scale historic socio-political events like the European colonial expansion have left long-lasting imprints on both biological and cultural diversity. The duration of European colonialism (i.e., the time a specific region was occupied by Europeans powers) significantly increases contemporary observed threat levels of biological and linguistic diversity. Significance StatementBiological and cultural diversity are closely intertwined. However, in an increasingly changing world where anthropogenic drivers put increasing pressures on ecosystems and cultures, both are threatened. Understanding how these threats to both, biological and linguistic diversity, are organized in space and where their individual and combined threat hotspots are is crucial for prioritization efforts to safeguard both. We also show what drivers affect their threat level globally and pinpoint that particularly large-scale socio-political events like the European colonial expansion have left long-lasting imprints on both biological and cultural diversity.

Published in People and Nature · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.