Validation of an AI for Skin Diseases in Korea and Global Usage Statistics
Han, S. S.; Cho, S. I.; Chang, S. E.; Kim, S. H.; Na, J.-i.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo address the diversity of skin conditions and the low prevalence of skin cancers, we curated a large dataset and collected real-world data, to evaluate the real-world performance. MethodsWe evaluated a neural network model using the NIA dataset (70 diseases; 152,443 images from 92,004 cases from 9 hospitals). The NIA dataset was used to calculate the algorithms sensitivity for detecting skin cancer. Global usage statistics (1,690,849 queries) were analyzed to estimate the algorithms specificity for malignancy predictions, assuming all predictions were false positives. A global reader test (61,066 questionnaires) was performed using the SNU dataset (80 diseases; 240 images). ResultsFor malignancy diagnosis (NIA dataset), the sensitivity of the algorithm was 78.2% based on the three predicted differentials. In global usage statistics, among predictions for tumorous conditions, the malignancy prediction rates from the three differentials were 12.0% in Korea and 10.0% globally. The algorithms predictions for benign tumors were most prevalent in Asia (55.5%), Oceania (46.8%), and Europe (46.5%), while predictions for infectious diseases were more common in Africa (17.1%) In the reader test (SNU dataset), sensitivity / specificity of the algorithm (87.5% / 91.0%) outperformed those of participants (Korea = 56.9% / 87.2%, global = 55.5% / 84.3%). ConclusionFor skin cancer diagnosis in Korea, the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were estimated to be 78.2% and 88.0%. Further research on appropriate indications is required for screening use, taking overdiagnosis into consideration.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural frameworks improve the accuracy of general practitioners in the classification of pigmented skin lesions 94%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 90%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- P. acnes qPCR-based antibiotics resistance assay (ACQUIRE) reveals widespread macrolide resistance in acne patients and can eliminate macrolide misuse in acne treatment 92%
- Budget Impact Analysis Of The Introduction Of Ranibizumabs Biosimilar To The Jordanian Joint Procurement System. 89%
- Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computer vision detects inflammatory arthritis in standardized smartphone photographs in an Indian patient cohort 92%
- Risk Factors, Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Bacterial Keratitis: The Nottingham Infectious Keratitis Study 90%
- Biologic Drug Survival in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review & Comparative Meta-Analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Skin Cancer Procedures, Medicare Reimbursement, and Overall Expenditures, 2012-2017 92%
- Point-of-care digital cytology with artificial intelligence for cervical cancer screening at a peripheral clinic in Kenya 90%
- Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model for detection of pneumothorax and tension pneumothorax on chest radiograph 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.