Back

Methylphenidate stabilizes dynamic brain network organization during tasks probing attention and reward processing in stimulant-naïve children with ADHD

Nugiel, T.; Fogleman, N. D.; Sheridan, M. A.; Cohen, J. R.

2025-01-28 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.01.27.25321175 medRxiv
Show abstract

Children with ADHD often exhibit fluctuations in attention and heightened reward sensitivity. Psychostimulants, such as methylphenidate (MPH), improve these behaviors in many, but not all, children with ADHD. Given the extent to which psychostimulants are prescribed for children, coupled with variable efficacy on an individual level, a better understanding of the mechanisms through which MPH changes brain function and behavior is necessary. MPHs primary action is on catecholamines, including dopamine and norepinephrine. Catecholaminergic signaling can influence the tradeoff between flexibility and stability of brain function, which is one candidate mechanism through which MPH may alter brain function and behavior. Time-varying functional connectivity, which models how functional brain networks reconfigure on short timescales, can be used to examine brain flexibility versus stability, and is thus well-suited to test how MPH impacts brain function. Here, we scanned stimulant-naive children with ADHD (8-12 years) on and off a single dose of MPH. In the MRI machine, participants completed two attention-demanding tasks: 1) a standard go/no-go task and 2) a rewarded go/no-go task. For both tasks, using a within-subjects design, we compared the degree to which brain organization changed throughout the course of the MRI scan, termed whole brain flexibility, on and off MPH. We found that whole brain flexibility decreased on MPH. Further, individuals with greater decreases in whole brain flexibility on MPH exhibited greater improvements in task performance. Together, these results provide novel insights into the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of MPH administration for children with ADHD.

Published in Translational Psychiatry (predicted rank #17) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.