Back

Methylphenidate stabilizes dynamic brain network organization during tasks probing attention and reward processing in stimulant-naïve children with ADHD

Nugiel, T.; Fogleman, N. D.; Sheridan, M. A.; Cohen, J. R.

2025-01-28 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.01.27.25321175 medRxiv
Show abstract

Children with ADHD often exhibit fluctuations in attention and heightened reward sensitivity. Psychostimulants, such as methylphenidate (MPH), improve these behaviors in many, but not all, children with ADHD. Given the extent to which psychostimulants are prescribed for children, coupled with variable efficacy on an individual level, a better understanding of the mechanisms through which MPH changes brain function and behavior is necessary. MPHs primary action is on catecholamines, including dopamine and norepinephrine. Catecholaminergic signaling can influence the tradeoff between flexibility and stability of brain function, which is one candidate mechanism through which MPH may alter brain function and behavior. Time-varying functional connectivity, which models how functional brain networks reconfigure on short timescales, can be used to examine brain flexibility versus stability, and is thus well-suited to test how MPH impacts brain function. Here, we scanned stimulant-naive children with ADHD (8-12 years) on and off a single dose of MPH. In the MRI machine, participants completed two attention-demanding tasks: 1) a standard go/no-go task and 2) a rewarded go/no-go task. For both tasks, using a within-subjects design, we compared the degree to which brain organization changed throughout the course of the MRI scan, termed whole brain flexibility, on and off MPH. We found that whole brain flexibility decreased on MPH. Further, individuals with greater decreases in whole brain flexibility on MPH exhibited greater improvements in task performance. Together, these results provide novel insights into the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of MPH administration for children with ADHD.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
4
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
7
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
9
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
10
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
12
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
18
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
26
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%