Back

Striatal cell-type specific stability and reorganization underlying agency and habit

Malvaez, M.; Liang, A.; Hall, B. S.; Giovanniello, J. R.; Paredes, N.; Gonzalez, J. Y.; Blair, G. J.; Sias, A. C.; Murphy, M. D.; Guo, W.; Wang, A.; Singh, M.; Griffin, N. K.; Bridges, S. P.; Wiener, A.; Pimenta, J. S.; Holley, S. M.; Cepeda, C.; Levine, M. S.; Blair, H. T.; Wikenheiser, A. M.; Wassum, K. M.

2025-01-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.26.634924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adaptive, goal-directed decision making requires agency, knowledge that an action will cause a particular outcome. For well-practiced routines, agency is relinquished in favor of automatic habits. Here, we used cell-type specific, longitudinal, cellular-resolution, microendoscopic calcium imaging, chemogenetics, instrumental conditioning and a test of behavioral strategy to ask how dorsomedial striatum D1+ and D2/A2A+ neurons contribute to the formation of agency and habit. We found that DMS D1+ neurons stably encode actions and variables related to goal-directed v. habitual behavioral strategy, develop encoding of the action-outcome relationship, and are critical for both action-outcome learning and the application of this learned agency for flexible, goal-directed decision making. Conversely, one ensemble of A2A+ neurons transiently encodes actions and behavioral transition variables during early action-outcome learning and another slowly starts to encode actions as routine habits form. Correspondingly, A2A+ neurons are only transiently necessary for initial formation of the action-outcome model underlying agency. Thus, agency is learned through DMS D1+ and A2A+ neuronal activity and then maintained in DMS D1+ neurons to support adaptive, goal-directed decision making. Habit formation is associated with reorganization of A2A+ neuronal encoding. These data reveal important insights into the neuronal circuits of learning and decision making.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.