Back

Joint association of genetic risk and accelerometer-based step count with cardiovascular disease: a UK-Biobank cohort study

Birmpili, P.; Portas, L.; Littlejohns, T.; Doherty, A.

2025-01-28 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.01.26.25321145 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis population-based prospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether accelerometer-measured step count is associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), independently from genetic risk. MethodsThe study included participants in the UK Biobank with valid accelerometer and genetic data and without prevalent CVD at baseline. Genetic risk for CVD was categorised as low (1st fifth), moderate (2nd-4th fifths), and high (5th fifth). Median daily step count was categorised as low (<6,500), moderate (6,500-12,499), and high ([&ge;]12,500). The association of genetic risk and step count with incident CVD, defined as a composite of coronary artery disease and ischaemic stroke, was examined using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. ResultsOf 84,286 participants, 4,847 were diagnosed with CVD during follow-up (median 7.9 years). High genetic risk and low daily step count had a log-additive association with incident CVD. In low genetic risk individuals, step count was not associated with incident CVD. However, in the moderate and high genetic risk groups, those with low step counts had 24% (HR 1.24; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.10-1.40) and 37% (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14-1.65) higher risk of incident CVD compared to those with high step counts. There was an inverse dose-response association between the hazard of CVD and step counts up to 10,000 steps/day, which then plateaued in moderate and high genetic risk groups. ConclusionsHigh daily step count was associated with lower CVD risk in individuals with moderate and high genetic risk, indicating that walking should be encouraged for all, especially those predisposed to CVD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.5%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
4
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
6
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
12
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
14
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
15
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%