Performance of an Electroencephalography-Measuring Headband or Actigraphy Compared with Polysomnography in Older Adults with Sleep Disturbances
Miner, B.; Pan, Y.; Cho, G.; Talarczyk, J.; Chen, A.; Burzynski, C.; Polisetty, L.; Doyle, M.; Iannone, L.; Mejnartowicz, S.; Breier, R.; Gill, T. M.; Yaggi, H. K.; Knauert, M.
Show abstract
Study ObjectivesIn older adults, self-reported sleep measures may be inaccurate, but polysomnography (PSG) is burdensome. We assessed the performance of an electroencephalography-measuring headband (HB) or actigraphy (ACT) compared with PSG in older adults with sleep disturbances. MethodsSixty-three adults aged [≥]60 years who reported symptoms of insomnia and/or daytime sleepiness [≥]once/week completed a week-long, home-based protocol during which they wore the HB for seven nights, an actigraph for seven days and nights, and completed a one-night level II unattended PSG. For the current analysis, we compared total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO) from all three devices on the PSG night. We calculated absolute differences and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for TST and WASO between HB and ACT, respectively, vs. PSG. We also evaluated the performance of the HB among subgroups of the poorest sleepers according to the presence of sleep apnea, insomnia, poor sleep quality, and periodic limb movements of sleep. Feasibility of the HB was assessed by measures of adherence (i.e., ability to use the HB over seven nights) and usability (i.e., ratings of items from the WEarable Acceptability Range [WEAR] scale). ResultsThe average age was 72.8 [standard deviation 6.6] years, 63.5% were female, and 63.5% identified as non-Hispanic White. On PSG, averages for TST and WASO were 370.1 [93] and 88.9 [63] minutes, respectively. For the HB vs. PSG, mean differences and ICCs were -11.9 minutes and 0.83 [0.74, 0.89] for TST; and -15.5 minutes and 0.65 [0.48, 0.77] for WASO. For ACT vs. PSG, mean differences for TST and WASO were larger, and ICCs showed lower levels of agreement. The HB performed well among the poorest sleepers, with ICCs >0.65 for TST and WASO. On average, participants wore the HB for 6.5 [0.8] nights, and usability was rated highly. ConclusionsThe HB demonstrated good agreement with PSG, outperforming ACT, including among the poorest sleepers. Devices like the HB might provide feasible measures of sleep that are more accurate than ACT and enhance the management of sleep health in older adults with sleep disturbances. Future research should focus on further validation of these devices in habitual sleep environments.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A clinical trial to evaluate the dayzz smartphone app on employee sleep, health, and productivity at a large US employer 97%
- Home-EEG assessment of possible compensatory mechanisms for sleep disruption in highly irregular shift workers - The ANCHOR study 97%
- A single nucleotide polymorphism in the HOMER1 gene is associated with sleep latency and theta power in sleep electroencephalogram 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methodological approach to sleep state misperception in insomnia disorder: comparison between multiple nights of actigraphy recordings and a single night of polysomnography recording 97%
- Application of Down-Phase Targeted Auditory Stimulation During Sleep in a Home Setting: A Feasibility Study Across Seven Consecutive Nights 95%
- Effects of one-night partial sleep deprivation on perivascular space volume fraction: Findings from the Stockholm Sleepy Brain Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective sleep onset latency is influenced by sleep structure and body heat loss in human subjects 96%
- The potential of ensemble-based automated sleep staging on single-channel EEG signal from a wearable device 95%
- Respiration-Triggered Olfactory Stimulation ReducesObstructive Sleep Apnea Symptoms Severity: A Prospective Pilot Study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.