Back

Performance of an Electroencephalography-Measuring Headband or Actigraphy Compared with Polysomnography in Older Adults with Sleep Disturbances

Miner, B.; Pan, Y.; Cho, G.; Talarczyk, J.; Chen, A.; Burzynski, C.; Polisetty, L.; Doyle, M.; Iannone, L.; Mejnartowicz, S.; Breier, R.; Gill, T. M.; Yaggi, H. K.; Knauert, M.

2025-01-27 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.01.25.25321124 medRxiv
Show abstract

Study ObjectivesIn older adults, self-reported sleep measures may be inaccurate, but polysomnography (PSG) is burdensome. We assessed the performance of an electroencephalography-measuring headband (HB) or actigraphy (ACT) compared with PSG in older adults with sleep disturbances. MethodsSixty-three adults aged [≥]60 years who reported symptoms of insomnia and/or daytime sleepiness [≥]once/week completed a week-long, home-based protocol during which they wore the HB for seven nights, an actigraph for seven days and nights, and completed a one-night level II unattended PSG. For the current analysis, we compared total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO) from all three devices on the PSG night. We calculated absolute differences and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for TST and WASO between HB and ACT, respectively, vs. PSG. We also evaluated the performance of the HB among subgroups of the poorest sleepers according to the presence of sleep apnea, insomnia, poor sleep quality, and periodic limb movements of sleep. Feasibility of the HB was assessed by measures of adherence (i.e., ability to use the HB over seven nights) and usability (i.e., ratings of items from the WEarable Acceptability Range [WEAR] scale). ResultsThe average age was 72.8 [standard deviation 6.6] years, 63.5% were female, and 63.5% identified as non-Hispanic White. On PSG, averages for TST and WASO were 370.1 [93] and 88.9 [63] minutes, respectively. For the HB vs. PSG, mean differences and ICCs were -11.9 minutes and 0.83 [0.74, 0.89] for TST; and -15.5 minutes and 0.65 [0.48, 0.77] for WASO. For ACT vs. PSG, mean differences for TST and WASO were larger, and ICCs showed lower levels of agreement. The HB performed well among the poorest sleepers, with ICCs >0.65 for TST and WASO. On average, participants wore the HB for 6.5 [0.8] nights, and usability was rated highly. ConclusionsThe HB demonstrated good agreement with PSG, outperforming ACT, including among the poorest sleepers. Devices like the HB might provide feasible measures of sleep that are more accurate than ACT and enhance the management of sleep health in older adults with sleep disturbances. Future research should focus on further validation of these devices in habitual sleep environments.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
5
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
9
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
24
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%