Back

Balancing Integration and Segregation: StructuralConnectivity as a Driver of Brain Network Dynamics

Palma-Espinosa, J.; Orellana Villouta, S.; Coronel-Oliveros, C.; Maidana, J. P.; Orio, P.

2025-01-25 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.24.634823 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brains ability to transition between functional states while maintaining both flexibility and stability is shaped by its structural connectivity. Understanding the relationship between brain structure and neural dynamics is a central challenge in neuroscience. Prior studies link neural dynamics to local noisy activity and mesoscale coupling mechanisms, but causal links at the whole-brain scale remain elusive. This study investigates how the balance between integration and segregation in brain networks influences their dynamical properties, focusing on multistability (switching between stable states) and metastability (transient stability over time). We analyzed a spectrum of network models, from highly segregated to highly integrated, using structural metrics like modularity, efficiency, and small-worldness. Simulating neural activity with a neural mass model and analyzing Functional Connectivity Dynamics (FCD), we found that segregated networks sustain dynamic synchronization patterns, while small-world networks, which balance local clustering and global efficiency, exhibit the richest dynamical behavior. Networks with intermediate small-worldness ({omega}) values showed peak dynamical richness, measured by variance in FCD and metastability. Using Mutual Information (MI), we quantified the structure-dynamics relationship, revealing that modularity is the strongest predictor of network dynamics, as modular architectures support transitions between dynamical states. These findings underscore the importance of the small-world architecture in brain networks, where the balance between local specialization and global integration fosters the dynamic complexity necessary for cognitive functions. By emphasizing the role of modularity, this study enhances understanding of how structural features shape neural dynamics and offers insights into disruptions linked to neurological disorders.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.3%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.2%
5
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
8
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
10
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
11
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
15
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
19
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
21
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%