Back

Tunneling CARs: Increasing CAR T tumor infiltration through the overexpression of MMP7 and SPP1

Van Pelt, S. N.; White, M.; Tat, C.; Hooper, D.; Talbot, L.; Fernandes, R.; Rooney, C.; Omer, B.

2025-01-27 immunology
10.1101/2025.01.24.634731 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in hematologic malignancies but has struggled to achieve comparable success in solid tumors. A key obstacle is the extracellular matrix (ECM) in solid tumors, which significantly impedes CART cell infiltration. In clinical trials, neuroblastoma (NB) has shown responsiveness to GD2-directed CART therapy, however, the failure of GD2.CARTs to effectively clear bulky disease - characterized by dense ECM - highlights the critical challenge of infiltration. In this study, we demonstrate that GD2.CARTs exhibit a unique infiltration-restriction compared to other CARTs and endogenous T cells. A separate analysis of clinical datasets identified MMP7 and SPP1 (OPN) as candidate genes to improve the infiltration of GD2.CARTs as these were upregulated in tumor-infiltrating leukocytes. MMP-7 and OPN overexpression enhanced CART extravasation (p < .001) and interstitial movement (p < .05) in ECM-dense environments in vitro. Overexpression of either OPN (p < .0001) or MMP-7 (p < .001) improved tumor infiltration in a xenograft model of NB. This resulted in improved tumor control (94% reduction in tumor burden, p < .05) and a survival extension in OPN-GD2.CART treated mice compared to unmodified GD2.CARTs (median of 148 days, p < .05). OPN overexpression did not increase off-target infiltration into healthy tissues or promote tumor metastasis, highlighting its potential for safe therapeutic application. Our study provides a framework for further exploration of gene modifications to improve CART infiltration and efficacy in solid tumors and identifies SPP1 as a candidate gene to improve GD2.CART treatment of bulky tumors.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.