Towards uniform recognition of child abuse in the Netherlands: implementing the Screening instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN)
van den Heuvel, E. A. L.; de Vries, D. S.; de Jong-van Kempen, B. M.; Bakx, R.; Bos, R. F.; van Empelen, P.; Hoedeman, F.; Kappen, T. H.; Russel-Kampschoer, I. M. B.; Puiman, P.; Schouten, M. C. M.; Teeuw, A. H.; Zwaans, C. J.; Nijhof, S. L.; van de Putte, E. M.
Show abstract
STUDY PURPOSEThis study investigates compliance with the Screening Instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN screening) and the usability of SCAN screening and its follow-up tool (SCAN-FU) for SCAN-positive outcomes, in 9 Emergency Departments (EDs). It aims to address the decline in child maltreatment recognition observed over the past decade in Dutch EDs. METHODSSCAN screening and SCAN-FU were integrated into the ED-workflow and electronic health records (EHRs), supported by an implementation strategy, e-learning, policy manuals, and an awareness campaign. Compliance was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-implementation screening rates, with clinically relevant improvement defined as a [≥]10% increase. Usability was assessed using the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations and semi-structured interviews. Subgroup analyses were conducted by hospital type, EHR, profession type, and years of working experience. RESULTSAfter implementation the average compliance rate increased from 57.5% to 70.5%, with 3 of 8 sites achieving a [≥]10% improvement. Compliance rates varied by site, with academic EDs benefiting most. Compliance was influenced by EHR configurations. Usability analysis identified five facilitators (perception of responsibility, social support, self-efficacy, knowledge, and formal ratification by management) and one barrier (unsettled organisation). Users considered SCAN screening and SCAN-FU user-friendly, though perceived support differed between nurses and physicians due to role-specific factors. RELEVANCESCAN screening can improve compliance in recognising child maltreatment, but tailored strategies are needed for further implementation. SCANs standardised approach enhances uniform data collection, enabling comparative analysis and interdisciplinary collaboration, advancing early detection of child maltreatment.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 95%
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures for COVID-19 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 94%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 94%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.