Motor evoked potentials as a side effect biomarker for deep brain stimulation programming
Testini, P.; Wang, A.; Cole, E. R.; Miocinovic, S.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo determine if motor evoked potentials (mEP) - stimulation-induced muscle activation measured using electromyography - can serve as a biomarker of corticobulbar (CBT) and corticospinal (CST) tract activation for deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming. MethodsIn 12 patients with Parkinsons disease and subthalamic or pallidal DBS, contact mapping determined clinical motor side effect thresholds. For equivalent stimulation parameters, EMG was recorded from cranial and arm muscles to determine the presence, peak amplitudes and latencies of mEP. Clinical and mEP thresholds were compared and accuracy metrics calculated to assess similarity between mEP and reported side effects. ResultsThe mEP amplitudes increased with stimulation intensity. Latencies were shorter for cranial muscles, which were more likely to generate an mEP. Clinical and mEP thresholds were significantly correlated (R2 = 0.31; p=0.0006), although most mEP thresholds were lower than clinical side effect thresholds. The mEP accuracy in predicting side effects was 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.73. ConclusionsEMG-recorded mEP correlated well with clinical side effects, and mEP often indicated subclinical CBT and CST activations. SignificanceThis study characterizes motor potentials evoked by DBS and demonstrates their utility as an objective biomarker for motor side effect threshold detection during DBS programming. Highlights- Deep brain stimulation can activate corticospinal/bulbar tract and evoke motor potentials in muscles measurable by surface EMG - Motor evoked potential thresholds correlate significantly with clinical side effect thresholds but occur at lower stimulation intensities - Motor evoked potentials may be a useful side effect biomarker for deep brain stimulation programming
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurofeedback-enabled beta power control with a fully implanted DBS system in patients with Parkinson’s disease 95%
- Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury 94%
- Electrophysiological Correlates of Dynamic Cycling in Parkinson’s Disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlling pallidal oscillations in real-time in Parkinson's disease using evoked interference deep brain stimulation (eiDBS): proof of concept in the human 94%
- Acute effects of Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease 94%
- Evaluation of DBS computational modeling methodologies using in-vivo electrophysiology in Parkinson's disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced selectivity of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation by multielectrode configuration 95%
- Automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters for modulating neuroimaging-based targets 94%
- Microneurography as a Minimally Invasive Method to Assess Target Engagement During Neuromodulation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 94%
- Stimulation-related increases in power spectral density covary with clinical evidence of overstimulation during deep brain stimulation for pediatric dystonia 94%
- How deep brain stimulation and levodopa affect gait variability in Parkinson’s disease 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.