Back

Evaluation of distal facial nerve branches contribution to facial nerve paralysis in rodents

Marin, B. G.; Grant, J. L.; Mei, C.; Tejeda, G.; Taylor, R. R.; Lee, G. M.; Ortega, V. L.; Cozzone, I. G.; Robbio, R. M.; Robbio, T.; Prasad, A.; Gadkaree, S. K.; Dumont, C. M.

2025-01-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.23.634588 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction/AimsFacial nerve paralysis is a complex and devastating condition. Translational research of facial paralysis recovery remains largely limited to animal studies, for which there are many potential models employed. When studying facial nerve regeneration in rodents, it is important to understand the converging contributions of the motor supply into the whisker pad. A consensus surgical approach and animal model has yet to be defined. Of particular interest for movement of the nose and whiskers are the buccal and marginal mandibular nerves. This study aims to evaluate how these distal nerve branches contribute to facial nerve paralysis and identify key morphological changes at the neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) in the whisker pad of rodents. MethodsAdult rats underwent isolated transection of the buccal branch of the facial nerve, both the buccal and marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerve, or control sham surgery. ResultsHistological, electrophysiological, and behavior assessments confirmed that the transection of the buccal branch alone did not cease whisker movement in rats, but when combined with a transection of the marginal mandibular branch, it resulted in full paralysis of the whisker and nose movement. DiscussionThese results are indicative of the distinct roles of these nerves branches in facial paralysis repair following a transection injury. Further, our results suggest additional targets for facial nerve repair treatments.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.