Cell-APP: A generalizable method for microscopic cell annotation, segmentation, and classification
Virdi, A. J.; Joglekar, A. P.
Show abstract
Deep learning-based segmentation models can accelerate the analysis of high-throughput microscopy data by automatically identifying and classifying cells in images. However, the datasets needed to train these models are typically assembled via laborious hand-annotation. This limits their scale and diversity, which in turn limits model performance. We present Cell-APP (Cellular Annotation and Perception Pipeline), a tool that automates the annotation of high-quality training data for transmitted-light (TL) cell segmentation. Cell-APP uses two inputs--paired TL and nuclear fluorescence images--and operates in two main steps. First, it extracts each cells location from the nuclear fluorescence channel and provides these locations to promptable deep learning models to generate cell masks. Then, it classifies each cell as mitotic or non-mitotic based on nuclear features. Together, these masks and classifications form the basis for cell segmentation training data. By training vision-transformer-based models on Cell-APP-generated datasets, we demonstrate how Cell-APP enables the creation of both cell line-specific and multi-cell line segmentation models. Cell-APP thus empowers laboratories to tailor cell segmentation models to their needs, and outlines a scalable path to creating general models for the research community. Significance StatementO_LIDeep learning-based cell segmentation models are typically trained on manually annotated datasets. Manual annotation limits dataset scalability and, consequently, the ability of trained models to generalize across cell types. C_LIO_LICell-APP automates mask generation and cell classification to rapidly create large, custom training datasets. It uses Meta AIs SAM for mask generation and extracts information from fluorescence signals for classification. C_LIO_LIBy reducing the need for hand-annotation, Cell-APP lowers the cost associated with building cell line-specific and generalist segmentation models. It may accelerate high-throughput image analysis and democratize model development across research labs. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural network automated segmentation of cellular structures in volume electron microscopy 95%
- Volumetric morphometry reveals mitotic spindle width as the best predictor of spindle scaling 94%
- Implicit Laplacian of Enhanced Edge: An Unguided Algorithm for Accurate and Automated Quantitative Analysis of Cytoskeletal Images 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- YeaZ: A convolutional neural network for highly accurate, label-free segmentation of yeast microscopy images 95%
- Large-scale capture of hidden fluorescent labels for training generalizable markerless motion capture models 95%
- ROSIE: AI generation of multiplex immunofluorescence staining from histopathology images 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.