Back

A synaptic-astrocytic proteomic signature associated with synaptopathy in Alzheimer's Disease

GRIFFITHS, J.; Schneegans, E.; Whitwell, H.; Qiu, Z.; Notman, B.; Cheung, D.; Willumsen, N.; Matthews, P. M.; Grant, S.; Jackson, J.

2025-01-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.23.634408 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Synapse loss is the greatest correlate of cognitive impairment in Alzheimers Disease (AD) and offers a therapeutic avenue alongside disease-modifying therapies. However, the events preceding synapse loss in the human condition have not been well characterised. In this study, we describe a pseudotemporal profile of alterations in the synaptic proteome prior to excitatory synapse loss in human post-mortem brain AD tissue using synapse proteomics and synaptome mapping techniques. In a region with early-stage disease pathology, the most predominant changes were pre-synaptic and featured changes in metabolism and exocytosis. In a mid-stage disease state, alongside initial synapse loss, there was a dominance of inhibitory synaptic changes. In a region with late-stage disease pathology and profound synapse loss, post-synaptic changes were most prevalent with a range of canonical synaptic transmission pathways reduced and differential excitatory synapse subtype pathology. Synapse loss was associated with changes in astrocytic proteins which were enriched for those at peri-synaptic astrocytic processes, including an upregulation of complement activation and endocytosis; a signature that differed from the astrocyte cytosolic proteome. Taken together, this provides evidence of a cascade of events leading to synapse loss with multiple points for therapeutic intervention to alleviate cognitive decline in AD. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD056052.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.