Changes in public perception of AI in healthcare after exposure to ChatGPT
Isaksen, A. A.; Schaarup, J. R.; Bjerg, L.; Hulman, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is expected to become an integral part of healthcare services, and the widespread adoption of AI tools in all areas of life is making AI accessible to the general public. Public perception of the benefits and risks of AI in healthcare is key to large-scale acceptance and implementation, and is increasingly influenced by first-hand experiences of AI. The aim of this study was to assess how exposure to ChatGPT changed public perception of AI in healthcare. MethodsWe used baseline and follow-up data from 5,899 survey participants, who reported their perception of AI in 2022 and 2024, and ChatGPT use in 2024. Administrative and healthcare data from nationwide Danish registers was used for weighting and adjustment. Multinomial multivariate logistic regression was used to model how exposure to ChatGPT use affected changes in perception of AI. ResultsAt baseline (before ChatGPTs launch) 2,236 individuals (37%) were unsure of the benefits and risks of AI in healthcare, 2,384 (40%) perceived net benefits, 1,083 (18%) perceived benefits and risks as equal, and 196 (3.3%) perceived net risks. At follow-up, 1,195 individuals (20%) had been exposed to ChatGPT use, which was associated with higher odds of changing perception of AI to benefits (OR 3.21 [95% CI: 2.34-4.40]) among individuals who were unsure at baseline, and lower odds of changing to uncertainty from more defined baseline perceptions (from benefits (OR 0.32 [0.24-0.42]), equal (OR 0.47 [0.32-0.69]) and risks (OR 0.27 [0.08-0.98])). ConclusionExposure to ChatGPT was associated with a change towards positive perception of benefits and risks of AI in healthcare among individuals who were uncertain prior to exposure, and individuals with more defined perceptions of AI were less likely to become uncertain after exposure to ChatGPT.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Can co-designed educational interventions help consumers think critically about asking ChatGPT health questions? Results from a randomised-controlled trial 94%
- Identifying clusters of people with Multiple Long-Term Conditions using Large Language Models: a population-based study 92%
- Simulated Misuse of Large Language Models and Clinical Credit Systems 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 93%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 93%
- Predictive performance and clinical application of COV50, a urinary proteomic biomarker in early COVID-19 infection: a cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 94%
- Development and validation of an algorithm to estimate the risk of severe complications of COVID-19 to prioritise vaccination 93%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Homebound by COVID19: The Benefits and Consequences of Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Strategies 92%
- How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study 92%
- Changes in COVID-19-related mortality across key demographic and clinical subgroups: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform on 18 million adults in England 90%
- The effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.