Back

Specificity of a polygenic score for aggressive prostate cancer

Dornisch, A.; Xu, G.; Karunamuni, R.; Brunette, C.; Danowski, M.; Teerlink, C.; Gaziano, J. M.; Garraway, I.; Hauger, R.; Kibel, A.; Lynch, J.; Maxwell, K.; Rose, B.; Andreassen, O.; Dale, A.; Donovan, J.; Hamdy, F.; Lane, A.; Mills, I.; Martin, R.; Neal, D.; Turner, E.; Wolk, A.; PRACTICAL Consortium, ; VA Million Veteran Program, ; Vassy, J. L.; Seibert, T. M.

2025-01-25 oncology
10.1101/2025.01.23.25321041 medRxiv
Show abstract

To address the concern that polygenic hazard scores for prostate cancer (PCa) might not distinguish between indolent and aggressive disease, we performed case-only analyses using a 601-variant polygenic score (PHS601). We hypothesized that among men who eventually developed PCa, those with higher PHS were more likely to develop aggressive disease. We analyzed genetic and phenotypic data from a diverse, national cohort of men diagnosed with PCa (Million Veteran Program, n = 69,901, 6413 metastatic). We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association of PHS601 with both age at onset of metastatic PCa (birth-to-met) and time from localized to metastatic diagnosis (localized-to-met). We performed an external validation of the case-only birth-to-met analysis in two population-based cohorts from the PRACTICAL Consortium. PHS601 was associated with both birth-to-met and localized-to-met within MVP. The HRs for men in the highest quintile of PHS601 vs. those in the lowest quintile (HR80/20) were 1.74 [1.65-1.84] and 1.41 [1.31-1.41] for birth-to-met and localized-to-met, respectively. These findings were validated in two external cohorts (COSM and ProtecT). PHS601 was also associated with earlier development of metastasis. Men with high PHS601 are diagnosed with prostate cancer at a younger age and are more likely to develop metastasis.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
7
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
8
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
16
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
20
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%