Accuracy of rapid antigen testing for COVID-19 in shelter settings
Garad, Y.; Manea, A.; Pak, N.; Barker, B.; Kasperavicius, D.; Danok, L.; Baral, S.; Orkin, A. M.; Siddiqui, A.; Straus, S. E.; Fahim, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disproportionally affected congregate living settings, including shelters. COVID-19 transmission can have more adverse outcomes in these settings due to the vulnerability of residents. Point of care rapid antigen testing (RAT) represents a strategy with potential benefits for COVID-19 detection in shelters, including rapid results, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and early detection. ObjectivesOur primary objective was to assess the real-world test accuracy of RAT for COVID-19 using the Quidel Sofia 2 Flu + SARS Antigen fluorescent immunoassay (Sofia RAT) compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing among shelter residents in Ontario, Canada. Study DesignA consecutive sample of 102 residents across six shelters who were symptomatic for, or exposed to COVID-19 were included. The RAT and PCR samples were taken on the same day for each participant. Results from the Sofia RAT were compared to PCR test results to determine test accuracy. Participant demographic data could not be collected due to workforce constraints. ResultsWe reported our methods and findings using the QUality Assessment tool of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) guidelines. Sofia 2 RAT specificity was 97.9% (95% CI: 92.7% to 99.7%) for COVID-19 compared to PCR. Due to a lack of true positive cases, sensitivity could not accurately be calculated (0.00% (95% CI: 0.00% to 52.2%)). ConclusionThese data suggest that the Sofia RAT is a highly specific test for COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance Evaluation Of A SARS-COV-2 Rapid Antigentest: Test Performance In The Community In The Netherlands 94%
- An optimized stepwise algorithm combining rapid antigen and RT-qPCR for screening of COVID-19 patients 94%
- Implementation of Rapid and Frequent SARS-CoV2 Antigen Testing and Response in Congregate Homeless Shelters 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 93%
- COVID-19 International Border Surveillance Cohort Study at Toronto’s Pearson Airport 93%
- Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: A qualitative study of university students and staff 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 94%
- Investigating sensitivity of nasal or throat (ISNOT): A combination of both swabs increases sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests 93%
- Evaluation of the INDICAID™ COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in symptomatic populations and asymptomatic community testing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability, usability and performance of lateral flow immunoassay tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: REACT-2 study of self-testing in non-healthcare key workers 93%
- When should healthcare workers with COVID-19 return to work? An analysis of follow-up antigen test results after a positive COVID test 91%
- Evaluation of six commercial SARS-CoV-2 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent assays for clinical testing and serosurveillance 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 93%
- Diagnostic testing preferences can help inform future public health response efforts: global insights from an international survey 92%
- Validity of Dried Blood Spot Testing for Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections: A Narrative Systematic Review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.