A pan-cancer atlas of T cell targets
Li, G.; Guzman-Bringas, O. U.; Sharma, A.; Harpaz, Z.; Tardio, E.; Natarajan, A.; Liu, X.; Taylor, D.; Yamin, R.; Dellacherie, M.; Krogsgaard, M.; Cruz, C. R.; Yarmarkovich, M.
Show abstract
T-cell-based immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer treatment, yet only a minority of patients are eligible for these approaches, significantly constrained by the limited knowledge of tumor-specific antigens. Here we present ImmunoVerse, a comprehensive map of T cell targets across 21 cancer types, revealing actionable tumor-specific targets in 89% of tumors analyzed. To define the repertoire of actionable T cell targets, we conducted an exhaustive pan-cancer analysis, integrating data from 7,188 RNA-Seq, 1,771 immunopeptidomes from 512 biological samples and 208 single-cell cancer datasets using novel AI methods, and compared these against 17,384 normal samples covering 51 tissues. Our analysis uncovered 62 viable surface protein targets and 28,446 tumor-specific HLA-presented antigens, deriving from 11 distinct molecular events, across 21 tumor types. Among these, we identified 5,928 previously uncharacterized neoantigens, new tumor self-antigens, peptides derived from tumor-specific cryptic ORFs, tumor-associated microbial targets and a novel splicing-derived PMEL peptide (sPMEL) with enhanced abundance and safety compared to the canonical clinical targets. We successfully expanded sPMEL-specific T cells, validating the therapeutic potential of these targets in functional assays. We highlight 153 promising new tumor targets and experimentally validate 19 targets representing six antigen classes. In addition to being the most comprehensive atlas of targets in scope, ImmunoVerse offers the most extensively annotated resource with key parameters for target selection, providing critical insights for therapeutic prioritization and clinical translation. To catalyze therapeutic development, we released our pan-cancer target atlas through an interactive web portal (https://www.immuno-verse.com) and made the accompanying toolkits available to the scientific community. This work redefines the landscape of therapeutic T cell targets and provides a foundational resource to unlock immunotherapy development across multiple cancers previously considered intractable.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- APMAT analysis reveals the association between CD8 T cell receptors, cognate antigen, and T cell phenotype and persistence 97%
- NeoPrecis: Enhancing Immunotherapy Response Prediction through Integration of Qualified Immunogenicity and Clonality-Aware Neoantigen Landscapes 96%
- Projecting single-cell transcriptomics data onto a reference T cell atlas to interpret immune responses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-omic landscape of human gliomas from diagnosis to treatment and recurrence 96%
- Single-cell integration and multi-modal profiling reveals phenotypes and spatial organization of neutrophils in colorectal cancer 95%
- Spatial proteo-transcriptomic profiling reveals the molecular landscape of borderline ovarian tumors and their invasive progression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Negative trade-off between neoantigen repertoire breadth and the specificity of HLA-I molecules shapes antitumour immunity 96%
- Multi-modal digital pathology for colorectal cancer diagnosis by high-plex immunofluorescence imaging and traditional histology of the same tissue section 95%
- Cancer-associated fibroblast compositions change with breast cancer progression linking S100A4 and PDPN ratios with clinical outcome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic annotation of orphan RNAs reveals blood-accessible molecular barcodes of cancer identity and cancer-emergent oncogenic drivers 96%
- Combined tumor and immune signals from genomes or transcriptomes predict outcomes of checkpoint inhibition in melanoma 96%
- Cell states and neighborhoods in distinct clinical stages of primary and metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.