Meta-analysis of studies on the association between physician characteristics and patient outcomes
Haslam, A.; Miller, S.; Prasad, V.
Show abstract
ObjectivePhysicians have a large role in patient outcomes, and some have questioned whether some physician characteristics lead to better outcomes for the patient. Multiple studies have been conducted on the topic, leading to a variety of conclusions. To determine how frequently studies find favorable patient outcomes, by physician characteristics and the pooled estimated effect. MethodsBy searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, we identified studies that reported the association between physician characteristics (age, experience, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, nationality, and patient/physician characteristic concordance) and patient outcomes (patient outcomes, such as survival/mortality, hospitalization, readmissions, length of stay, and morbidity). We calculated the frequency of studies reporting on each type of physician characteristics and each type of patient outcome, risk of bias in included studies, and pooled estimates of association between physician characteristics and patient outcomes. ResultsOf the 32 included studies, the most common outcome was mortality. There were no differences in outcomes for physicians with more experience, compared with less experience (pooled odds ratio [OR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.98 to 1.01; I2: 56.5%), between older and younger physicians (pooled OR: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.97 to 1.05; I2: 68.1%), but there were significantly better outcomes for patients with a female physician, compared to patients with a male physician, although this difference was small and biased (pooled OR: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 0.98; I2: 35.5%). Selection bias, unaccounted measurement in physician and patient characteristics, and not accounting for unintended exposures limit the findings of these types of studies. ConclusionStrategies to improve patient outcomes should focus on other factors. Moreover, when seeking care, patients should be more concerned about physician track record than non-modifiable characteristics.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 94%
- The protective association between statins use and adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative bias analysis methods for summary level epidemiologic data in the peer-reviewed literature: a systematic review 94%
- Clinical Trials in COVID-19 Management & Prevention: A Meta-epidemiological Study examining methodological quality 92%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 93%
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 93%
- The devil is in the details: Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopedic clinical trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of patients’ past misdiagnosis experiences with trust in their current physician: the TRUMP 2 -Net study 92%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 91%
- Black women in medical education publishing: Bibliometric and testimonio accounts using intersectionality methodology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation and external validation of a simple risk score to predict in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 91%
- Risk Factor Stratification for Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Database Study 90%
- Effect of Tai Ji and/or Qigong on Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease A protocol for meta-analysis and systematic review 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.